Back

RNA editing and trans-splicing with reprogrammed tracrRNAs

Arifah, A.;Patinios, C.;Larose, R.;Beisel, C.

2026-06-29 Synthetic Biology
10.64898/2026.06.28.735058 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Natural CRISPR-Cas9 systems rely on crRNA-tracrRNA duplexes to guide DNA targeting. Prior work showed that tracrRNAs could be reprogrammed to hybridize to cellular RNAs, resulting in their conversion into non-canonical crRNAs that enabled RNA detection and recording. However, the fate of the cellular RNA and the engineering opportunities it affords remain unexplored. Here, we show that the hybridized RNA is not inactivated, allowing the recruitment of Cas9 to the RNA duplex to drive RNA base editing and trans-splicing. Fusing ADAR2dd to dSpyCas9 and systematically engineering the reprogrammed tracrRNA (Rptr) enabled efficient and tunable A-to-I RNA editing, with on- and off-target profiles comparable to dCas13. The methodology extended to the compact CjeCas9 that could be further tailored for RNA targeting by deleting the HNH domain and mutating the PAM-interacting domain. Finally, utilizing Rptrs to block splicing enabled 3' and 5' RNA trans-splicing. Thus, Rptrs offer a versatile alternative to conventional Cas9 guide RNA architectures for programmable RNA manipulation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 4%
26.8%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Molecular Cell
○ 350 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.0%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nature
○ 645 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.9%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Nature Methods
○ 385 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
7
Nature Biotechnology
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
8
Science
● 477 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
9
Cell
○ 431 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
10
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.7%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 19%
2.7%
12
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 16%
2.1%
13
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
14
Nature Chemical Biology
○ 119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Molecular Therapy
○ 81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Cell Genomics
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Cell Chemical Biology
○ 94 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Nature Genetics
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
20
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
236 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Cell Reports Methods
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.