Back

Color polymorphism in the saddleback clownfish, Amphiprion polymnus: species or complex?

Fitzgerald, L. M.; Coulmance, F.; Marcionetti, A.; Gaboriau, T.; Garcia Jimenez, A.; Apag, P. T.; Versteeg, M.; Noble, F. J.; Gaffney, K.; Mercader, M.; Diola, A. G.; Geraldino, P. J.; Rueger, T.; Laudet, V.; Salamin, N.

2026-06-29 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.28.735040 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Color polymorphism can facilitate local adaptation, maintain intraspecific diversity, or reflect early stages of speciation. Clownfishes (Amphiprion spp.) typically display a simple black, orange, and white pattern, but the saddleback clownfish (Amphiprion polymnus) shows striking variation in melanism and the number of vertical bars, which are thought to play a role in species recognition. In 2024, a revision on iNaturalist split A. polymnus into multiple species based solely on color pattern and geographic range. This raises the question of whether these morphs represent true species or intraspecific polymorphism, which we tested using genomic and image-based data. We sampled 97 individuals from seven populations across the species range and quantified color patterns from standardized photographs. Phenotypic and genomic analyses reveal a complex pattern of divergence. Image analysis identified three distinct phenotypic clusters, with A. polymnus, A. annamensis, and A. laticlavius each showing consistent differences in saddle shape and vertical bar extent. ADMIXTURE resolved three distinct genetic groups corresponding to the morphs. Pairwise FST (0.54-0.71) and dxy indicate extremely high differentiation between A. polymnus and A. annamensis, consistent with species-level divergence, whereas A. laticlavius shows much lower differentiation from A. polymnus (FST 0.09-0.18) and higher differentiation from A. annamensis (FST 0.64-0.66). Overall, phenotypic and genomic data show structured variation, but the status of A. laticlavius remains ambiguous. Our study reveals clear and structured divergence across the full range, yet the taxonomic interpretation of this variation remains inherently challenging. The key question remains: do these patterns reflect a single polymorphic species or a complex of closely related species?

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.7%
2
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.4%
5
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
6
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
7
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
14
Journal of Fish Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
16
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
19
Journal of Phycology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
20
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
21
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
23
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
24
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
25
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.1%
26
Evolutionary Ecology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
27
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
28
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
29
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
30
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%