Prediction of post-operative delirium with machine learning in abdominal surgery with comorbidity indices and laboratory values
Chorney, W.; Kang, S.; Ling, S. H.; Lisi, M.
Show abstract
Background: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a complication associated with most types of surgery, and is associated with a number of detrimental effects. Therefore, it is of interest to determine which patients may be at higher risk of POD so that mitigating steps may be taken. We sought to determine whether POD can be accurately predicted with common machine learning (ML) models. Methods: Using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database, we identified 8026 abdominal surgery procedures across 7215 adult patients. Using demographic information, such as age, type of surgery, sex; as well as commonly measured laboratory values (such as electrolytes and blood counts) and comorbidity indices, we determined to what extend common ML models, such as random forests, support vector machines, extreme gradient boosted machines, and neural networks, could predict POD. Results: Random forests outperformed logistic regression, support vector machines, extreme gradient boosted machines, and neural networks, with respect to individual t-tests. The random forest model had a sensitivity of 73.11, a specificity of 71.14, and an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.800. Age, comorbidity indices, gender, and alcohol use carried significant predictive weight in this cohort. Conclusions: Machine learning models are effective predictors of postoperative delirium, although further work is required to increase clinical utility of such tools. Markers of inflammation, comorbidity indices, and alcohol use are important predictive features alongside better-known features such as age.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a Risk Prediction Model for Sepsis-Related Delirium Based on Multiple Machine Learning Approaches and an Online Calculator 95%
- Regional performance variation in external validation of four prediction models for severity of COVID-19 at hospital admission: An observational multi-centre cohort study 95%
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 96%
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 96%
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Novel Method for Handling Pre-Existing Conditions in Prediction Models for Covid-19 Death 93%
- Prediction of high-risk liver cancer patients from their mutation profile: Benchmarking of mutation calling techniques 92%
- Point-of-care electroencephalography for prediction of postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing elective surgery: protocol for a prospective cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of automated computer aided-risk score for predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality using first electronically recorded blood test results and vital signs for COVID-19 hospital admissions: a retrospective development and validation study 95%
- Use of the first National Early Warning Score recorded within 24 hours of admission to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in unplanned COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 94%
- Performance of digital Early Warning Score (NEWS2) in a cardiac specialist setting: retrospective cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting bloodstream infection outcome using machine learning 94%
- Application of physiological network mapping in the prediction of survival in critically ill patients with acute liver failure 93%
- Rapid Clinical Screening and Staging for COVID-19 Severe Outcome A Hospitalization Study in New York City 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.