Effects of cognitive training under inspiratory hypoxia on cognition and neuroplasticity in healthy humans: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, four-arm trial
Damgaard, V.; Schandorff, J. M.; Johansen, A.; Macoveanu, J.; Cramer, K.; Ostergaard, I. P.; Thommesen, K. K.; Bruun, C. F.; Meyer, M.; Plaven-Sigray, P.; Lehel, S.; Svarer, C.; Knudsen, G. M.; Jorgensen, M. B.; Kessing, L. V.; Ehrenreich, H.; Miskowiak, K. W.
Show abstract
Moderate hypoxia is increasingly recognized as a physiological driver of neuroprotection and neuroregeneration. In this first randomised, double-blind, controlled, four-arm trial, we demonstrate the cognitive and neuroplastic effects of cognitive training under moderate inspiratory hypoxia in humans. Healthy volunteers underwent three weeks of either cognitive or sham training under normobaric hypoxia (12% O2) or normoxia (20% O2) for 3.5 hours daily, six days per week. Participants were assessed at baseline, treatment completion, and one-month follow-up. The primary outcome was change in a broad cognitive composite score. Additional cognitive, blood-based, and neuroimaging outcomes were assessed, including measurement of the presynaptic protein SV2A with [11C]UCB-J positron emission tomography (PET) and neural activity through functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In total, 126 participants were randomised to hypoxia-cognitive training (H-CT: n=36), hypoxia-sham training (H-ST: n=30), normoxia- cognitive training (N-CT: n=30), or normoxia-sham training (N-ST: n=30). Intention-to-treat analyses showed no effect of H-CT relative to N-ST in the primary outcome at treatment completion (primary endpoint; treatment effect=0.11, 95% CI=[-0.06;0.28], p=0.19), but improvements emerged at follow-up (treatment effect=0.17, 95% CI=[0.01;0.34], p=0.04). N-CT induced transient improvement in the primary outcome at treatment completion (treatment effect=0.20, 95% CI=[0.02;0.38], p=0.03), which rendered non-significant at follow-up. Finally, H-ST showed no significant cognitive change relative to N-ST. Moderate hypoxia was safe and well-tolerated. Cognitive benefits were accompanied by decreased hippocampal presynaptic density measured with [11C]UCB-J PET. In conclusion, three weeks of H-CT can enhance cognition with associated effects on neuroplasticity, although with a delayed onset of effects on cognition.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Angiotensin blockade enhances motivational reward learning via enhancing ventral striatal prediction error and frontostriatal communication 93%
- A neurometabolic mechanism involving dmPFC/dACC lactate in physical effort-based decision-making 93%
- Deletion of Crtc1 leads to hippocampal neuroenergetic impairments associated with depressive-like behavior 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Statistical power and false positive rates for interdependent outcomes are strongly influenced by test type: Implications for behavioral neuroscience 91%
- Perinatal exposure to fluoxetine and maternal adversity affect myelin-related gene expression and epigenetic regulation in the corticolimbic circuit of juvenile rats 91%
- Unravelling the effects of methylphenidate on the dopaminergic and noradrenergic functional circuits 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The circulating proteome and brain health: Mendelian randomisation and cross-sectional analyses 93%
- Kynurenines Increase MRS Metabolites in Basal Ganglia and Decrease Resting State Connectivity in Frontostriatal Reward Circuitry in Depression 92%
- Neurometabolic predictors of mental effort in the frontal cortex 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- L-DOPA modulates activity in the vmPFC, Nucleus Accumbens and VTA during threat extinction learning in humans 92%
- Glutathione in the nucleus accumbens regulates motivation to exert reward-incentivized effort 91%
- Pleiotropic effects of trisomy and pharmacologic modulation on structural, functional, molecular, and genetic systems in a Down syndrome mouse model 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.