Socioecological differentiation and the evolution of brain size and synaptic architecture in predatory ants, Neoponera

Brain size and structure are hypothesized to be adaptively designed to satisfy the behavioral requirements of securing food and living socially. The importance of these socioecological and sociobiological selective forces in brain evolution is constantly debated. Socioecological divergence is striking in the Neotropical ant genus Neoponera: N. apicalis is a generalist solitary predator forming small colonies of ~100 whereas N. commutata colonies are approximately 10 times as large and workers pheromonally organize cooperatively raids only on Syntermes termite colonies. We interspecifically compared the size and structure of the compound eyes, size and number of antennal glomeruli, mosaic brain scaling and synaptic processing (microglomeruli-MG). Our results indicate that N. apicalis workers have a larger number of ommatidia, antennal lobe glomeruli, and allometrically larger antennal and optic lobes than N. commutata. These sensory traits were associated with differences in higher-order processing architectures in the mushroom body (MB) microglomeruli (MG). N. commutata workers had an allometrically larger MB, perhaps due to their socially complex chemical foraging communication, although MG density in N. apicalis was higher in both the MB lip and collar, regions associated with processing olfactory and visual information, respectively. The increase in MG density in N. apicalis may be associated with higher demands for navigation, learning, and memory, as well as a higher density of antennal lobe glomeruli to support prey odor discrimination. In contrast, N. commutata workers had larger ommatidia and antennal lobe glomeruli. Larger ommatidia correlate with their diurnal/nocturnal habits and a larger MB Our findings indicate that differences in behavioral performance demands associated with socioecological differentiation are reflected in variation in visual and olfactory system structure, brain size, mosaicism, and synaptic organization. Our results support both social and ecological brain hypothesis as drivers of mosaic brain evolution.