Back

Small Structural Variations, Large Functional Consequences: Comparative Analysis Reveals Structural Control of Ubiquitylation Site Selection by BRCA1/BARD1

Heidari, S.; Lightle, C.; Herrington, L.; Shah, T.; Hossain, F.; Morcos, F.; Weintraub, S. T.; Stewart, M. D.; Torabifard, H.

2026-07-01 biophysics
10.64898/2026.06.26.734868 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BRCA1/BARD1 is a chromatin-associated E3 ubiquitin ligase that ubiquitylates histone H2A to coordinate DNA damage repair, transcriptional repression, and genome stability. In Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans), the orthologous BRC-1/BRD-1 complex performs analogous functions but exhibits structural variation, most notably through an additional 11-residue loop in BRD-1 that is absent from human BARD1. Prior experiments indicate this worm-specific insertion promotes nucleosome engagement and may alter the preferred lysine target for ubiquitylation. Here, we provide a cross-species comparison by integrating computational and experimental investigation to clarify how a discrete structural variation can tune BRCA1-family ligase behavior and, consequently, chromatin regulation. In vitro ubiquitylation assays and mass spectrometry reveal BRC-1/BRD-1 ubiquitylate the C-terminal tail of histone H2A with less specificity than the human homologs. All-atom molecular dynamics simulations of both the C. elegans BRC-1/BRD-1-LET-70-Ubiquitin assembly and the human BRCA1/BARD1-UbcH5c- Ubiquitin complex in the presence of the nucleosome core particle uncover that the BRD-1 loop makes transient contacts with nucleosomal DNA and histone tails, thereby modulating the positioning and conformational flexibility of the bound E2 (ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme). Together, our results suggest that the BRD-1 loop alters the E3-E2 geometry, thereby altering ubiquitylation-site specificity.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.