Back

Latitude, not geography, globally structures Oscheius tipulae into three deeply divergent lineages

Lee, J.; Lim, D. S.; Byeon, D.

2026-06-30 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.26.734863 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Free-living nematodes are among the most abundant animals on Earth and play critical ecological roles in soil ecosystems. However, the global population structure and evolutionary history of most species remain poorly understood. Here, we analyzed genome-wide variation in Oscheius tipulae using whole-genome sequence data from 31 isolates, including 28 publicly available genomes and three newly collected strains from Korea. Population structure analyses, phylogenomic inference, and ancestry estimation consistently identified three deeply divergent lineages. These analyses did not detect admixture among lineages and collectively supported a predominantly tree-like evolutionary history. Notably, the lineages were structured by latitude rather than geographic proximity. Isolates from similar latitudinal zones clustered together regardless of continental origin, forming three major groups: northern mid-latitude (NML), low-latitude (LL), and southern mid-latitude (SML). This pattern indicates that the lineages have maintained largely independent evolutionary trajectories over extended timescales despite the potential for long-distance dispersal. Furthermore, environmentally associated variants showed significant differentiation among lineages, indicating that environmental selection may contribute to the maintenance of this latitudinally structured diversity. Our results reveal unexpectedly deep global divergence within O. tipulae, and highlight the importance of ecological divergence and long-term lineage retention in shaping the global diversity of this group.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.6%
2
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.4%
3
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 8%
7.7%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 7%
6.5%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.4%
7
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.2%
9
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
10
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.9%
11
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
13
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
14
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
15
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
16
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
19
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.3%
20
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
22
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%