Back

A modular generalist-specialist AI framework for ROI selection across spatial profiling workflow

Castillo, S. P.; Gautam, T.; Pinao Gonzales, K. B.; Salvatierra, M. E.; Serrano, A.; Ercan, C.; Rodriguez, B. L.; Acosta, P.; Chen, P.; Shokrollahi, Y.; Lau, A.; Kwong, L. N.; Huse, J. T.; Pan, X.; Patient Mosaic Team, ; Solis Soto, L. M.; Yuan, Y.

2026-07-01 pathology
10.64898/2026.06.26.734862 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Selection of regions of interest (ROIs) is often a crucial step in spatial molecular profiling and many pathology tasks, with substantial implications for research reproducibility and biological interpretability. To provide a reproducible and adaptive framework for AI-guided ROI selection, we developed a modular generalist-specialist solution across spatial profiling platforms. In a cohort comprising 55 tumor types from 160 tissue donors profiled using NanoString Digital Spatial Profiling and multiplex immunofluorescence, we first established a protein-profiling reference atlas capturing compartment-specific immune, checkpoint, stromal, and proliferation patterns. We then developed an AI Specialist Task-Oriented Model for ROI Selection (ASTROS) and tested comprehensive benchmarks considering specialist-only (ASTROS), generalist-only (PLIP/GFM), and hybrid generalist-specialist strategies, showing that the latter provides a balanced tradeoff across slide-level signal preservation, pathologist-reference concordance, within-slide placement consistency, and large-slide computational efficiency. We further demonstrated the feasibility of virtual staining for ROI preview and modular ROI placement for other spatial omics technologies, Visium and Visium HD workflows. Together, these results support our proposed framework to enable ROI selection responding to unmet needs for reducing inter-rater variability, reproducibility, and versatility in spatial profiling experiments.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 13%
13.1%
2
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
3
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
4
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.8%
5
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.1%
7
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
8
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
10
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
11
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
14
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.8%
16
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.8%
17
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
19
Modern Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
22
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
24
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
26
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
27
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
29
Journal of Pathology Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
30
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%