Back

Sparse Distributed Archetypes Reveal Compressible Network Motifs Underlying Naturalistic Cognition

Owen, L. L. W.; Stone, E.; Shepherd, A.

2026-06-28 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.26.734861 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Naturalistic cognition emerges from coordinated interactions among distributed brain systems operating across multiple representational scales. Characterizing this organization remains challenging because cognitively relevant information is embedded within high-dimensional neural activity. Here, we apply Multisubject Archetypal Analysis (MS-AA) [1] to naturalistic fMRI data collected during intact narrative listening, word-scrambled audio, and rest to investigate how condition-relevant information is distributed across archetypal representations. We examine both spatial and temporal formulations of MS-AA as complementary views of naturalistic brain activity. Across analyses, decoding performance consistently followed the hierarchy intact > word-scrambled > rest, indicating that archetypal representations preserve meaningful condition-related structure. Top-m decoding analyses further revealed that this information is highly compressible: relatively small subsets of archetypes frequently recovered substantial fractions of full-model decoding performance. Spatial AA exhibited a stable sparse-decoding regime that persisted across representational scales. Across a broad range of matched component ratios, approximately 5-15 archetypes consistently captured disproportionate amounts of condition-relevant information. These same sparse subsets also organized subjects into condition-aligned clusters more strongly than expected from random archetype subsets, with the strongest joint decoding-clustering effects occurring repeatedly within an intermediate representational regime (K {approx}50 - 88). Network over-representation analyses revealed that informative archetypes were not isolated canonical networks but distributed mixtures of interacting systems. Across the highest-performing decoding- clustering configurations, default mode and frontoparietal systems were consistently overrepresented relative to network size, whereas visual and limbic systems were underrepresented. Together, these findings suggest that the archetypal motifs most informative for distinguishing cognitive states are sparse, distributed subnetworks enriched for higher-order association systems. More broadly, the results demonstrate that MS-AA provides a useful framework for studying the compressibility, geometry, and multiscale organization of cognitive brain states.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
16.8%
2
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.5%
4
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.6%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.2%
7
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.6%
10
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.4%
12
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
14
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
19
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
20
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.0%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Cognitive Neurodynamics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%