Back

Inducible activation of small GTPases reveals direct effector recruitment and signalling dynamics

Singh, S.;Goudreault, M.;Smith, M.

2026-06-27 Cell Biology
10.64898/2026.06.26.734842 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RAS GTPases regulate cellular activity through the selective activation of effectors, yet identifying proteins directly recruited by small GTPases in cells remains challenging. Current approaches rely on extracellular stimulation or prolonged expression of constitutively active mutants, which trigger secondary signalling and negative feedback pathways. Most of the RAS superfamily also lack known upstream activators, limiting investigation of their biological functions. Here we develop SPaRTa (Sequestered Protein activation through RAS-TEV actuation), an inducible system in which activated GTPases are maintained in a sequestered state by tethered effector-binding domains that can be released by rapamycin-induced reconstitution of split-TEV protease. We first applied SPaRTa to KRAS, as despite being one of the most intensely studied proteins in biology fundamental questions regarding its effector engagement remain unresolved. KRAS became activated within minutes of proteolytic release and stimulated rapid MAPK activity. Direct visualization of effector recruitment revealed distinct responses: BRAF was rapidly recruited to the plasma membrane (PM), whereas AFDN and RASSF5 accumulated gradually. In contrast, PI3K and SHOC2 were not recruited despite robust KRAS activation, though EGF stimulation efficiently re-localized PI3K to the membrane. This suggests that activation of KRAS alone is insufficient to stimulate PI3K. Sequestration shapes signalling as both AFDN and RASSF5 are subcellularly partitioned in the nucleus, and only prolonged KRAS activation re-located these effectors to the PM. Inducible activation of a designed RHOG SPaRTa resulted in ELMO1 recruitment and robust lamellipodia formation. Our system thus provides a broadly applicable platform for defining direct GTPase-effector interactions and signalling dynamics in cells.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 6%
22.0%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 6%
12.9%
3
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
4
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
5
Journal of Cell Biology
392 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 13%
4.1%
7
Science Signaling
65 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
8
The EMBO Journal
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
9
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
Developmental Cell
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.8%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.5%
13
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
14
Molecular Cell
350 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
18
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Nature Cell Biology
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
22
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%
23
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.6%