Back

Trait-dependent species responses weaken the effects of response diversity on community stability

Heinrichs, A. L.; Polazzo, F.; Kunze, C.; Ghedini, G.

2026-06-27 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.26.734835 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The diversity of species responses to environmental change (response diversity) is a key mechanism of ecological stability. However, anticipating where strong or weak stabilizing responses emerge is challenging because species responses can depend on the local community and the specific stability metric. Whether species traits can consistently inform on how species respond to disturbances, enabling less context-dependent predictions, remains an open question. To address this gap, we use microcosm experiments on marine phytoplankton to test how response diversity supports multiple aspects of community stability under pulse temperature changes, testing both an increase (heatwave) and a decrease in temperature (coldspell). We then map species traits to their responses in a community to identify which traits modulate and predict species' sensitivities. Fundamental response diversity, based on the diversity of species responses to temperature measured in isolation, was a weak predictor of community stability, and relationships differed between disturbances (i.e., heatwave and coldspell). Instead, species traits were consistent predictors of species responses in communities. Small, fast-growing species were more tolerant and benefited from the disturbance, while large, slow-growing species were less tolerant and decreased in proportion - these patterns were consistent across disturbances and community compositions. These results suggest that strong trait-performance relationships might reduce the importance of response diversity for stability. But these findings also show that general species traits, such as size and growth rate, can predict which species, and how, contribute to community responses, providing an empirical basis to relate species traits to stability outcomes under climate change.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
4
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
11
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
12
Limnology and Oceanography
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.4%
14
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
16
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
18
Journal of Phycology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
20
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
21
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
23
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%