Back

Fragment Morphometry Analysis And Same-Color-Channel Separation Enable Objective Quantification Across Bbb Models

Peck, B. D.; O'Hare, N. R.; Ferris, C. F.; Pinals, R. L.; Ebong, E. E.

2026-06-27 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.26.734824 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Quantifying blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity from fluorescence microscopy remains limited by subjective scoring and categorical classification methods that lack reproducibility. For objective and consistent BBB phenotyping, we present two semi-automated image-analysis pipelines that replace manual scoring with quantitative, continuous-variable measurements. Our in vitro pipeline, implemented in Python, quantifies the connectivity of tight junction structures by measuring discrete ZO-1 fragment objects within manually traced junction regions. It outputs continuous metrics including average fragment area, total junctional area, and a junctional fragmentation ratio that captures degree of ZO-1 continuity versus discontinuity. In human brain microvascular endothelial cells subjected to glycocalyx component knockdown, the pipeline detected significantly reduced fragment area (37% decrease for both CD44 and syndecan-1 (SDC1) knockdown, p = 0.0148 and 0.0084) and junctional fragmentation ratio (p = 0.0061 and 0.0137). Our in vivo pipeline integrates ilastik-based pixel classification with FIJI macro automation to quantify vascular marker colocalization and to separate vessel signal from microglial contamination within a single fluorescence channel, eliminating the need for dedicated counterstains. Applied across four mouse cohorts [young, aged, Alzheimer's, traumatic brain injury (TBI)] and three brain regions [prefrontal cortex (PFC), hippocampus, midbrain], the pipeline revealed concurrent ZO-1 loss and ICAM-1 elevation in the PFC and hippocampus of aged and Alzheimer's mice, with Alzheimer's-specific doubling of eNOS occurring in the PFC (p = 0.0013). TBI mice showed persistent ZO-1 loss with transient ICAM-1 and eNOS changes. Both deterministic pipelines are available on GitHub and designed for adoption beyond the specific markers and systems analyzed here.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 5%
9.3%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.2%
3
Neurophotonics
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
4
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.7%
5
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.5%
6
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.7%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.4%
8
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
9
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
11
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
12
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
89 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
15
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.1%
21
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
22
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
BMC Methods
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
24
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
28
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
29
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
30
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%