Back

Feasibility and repeatability of MEG-compatible patellar-tendon stimulator for eliciting knee-joint proprioceptive cortical responses

Li, F.; Byman, A.; Chen, J.; Mujunen, T.; Piitulainen, H.

2026-07-01 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.26.734808 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background Cortical processing of the knee-joint proprioception is largely unknown. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) can be used to quantify the cortical processing of the proprioceptive afference, but MEG-compatible and well-controlled stimulation of the knee joint is technically challenging, and thus has received less attention. New method We introduced a novel MEG-compatible stimulator that delivers controlled patellar tendon stretches to activate muscle afferent of the knee extensors. The stimulus intensity is adjustable, allowing graded activation of proprioceptive input and, when required, elicitation of the patellar-tendon reflex. Results The novel stimulator elicited clear muscular and cortical responses in both intensity conditions. Cortical responses demonstrated moderate to excellent intersession reliability for peak evoked field amplitude (ICC: 0.69--0.96), beta suppression (0.89--0.90) and beta rebound (0.96--0.97). Notably, beta suppression peaked more laterally than expected in both hemispheres. Peak EMG amplitudes in VL and VM muscles were reliable for both intensity conditions (ICC: 0.66--0.89), and stimulus kinematics remained consistent throughout measurements. Comparison with existing methods Previous robotic or motor-driven devices have been used to evoke cortical responses to knee-joint proprioceptive stimulation, but mechanical coupling across adjacent joints may limit knee-specific input. The present stimulator provides mechanically simple and MEG-compatible alternative that targets knee extensor afferents more directly, reduces distal joint involvement. Conclusion The novel stimulator is a feasible and repeatable tool to study cortical processing of proprioceptive afference from the knee-joint using MEG. The spatially unexpected beta rhythm suppression suggests that knee-joint proprioceptive afference may involve more unique sensorimotor cortical neuronal network than previously recognized.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
21.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 5%
9.6%
3
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.2%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.4%
5
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
6
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
8
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
9
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
11
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
20
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
21
Brain Research
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
22
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
23
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
28
Journal of Visualized Experiments
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%