Back

Random innervation of cerebellar Purkinje cells as a substrate for diverse representational learning

Holtrup, A. A.; Khajeh, R.; Lee, W.-C. A.

2026-06-28 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.26.734775 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although the cerebellar microcircuit is among the most well-characterized systems for studying neural computation, recent connectomic analyses highlight deviations from canonical models, raising fundamental questions about connectivity, function, and learning in the system. A key feature of the circuit is the convergence of a vast number of parallel fibers (PFs) onto Purkinje cells (PCs). Prevailing models of cerebellar computation assume all-to-all connectivity at this intersection, whereby a single PC "samples" from all PFs. However, experimental evidence suggests that each PC is innervated by only a subset of accessible PFs. This partial sampling creates differential connectivity that may reflect an organizational principle of cerebellar learning, but its implications are poorly understood. Based on electron microscopy (EM) reconstructions, we show that PF innervation of PCs is largely consistent with a Bernoulli model where connections are randomly and independently distributed within anatomical constraints. In further support of a random model, we observe that connections of the ascending branches of granule cells are not predictive of connections of their PFs, nor is connectivity correlated across separate spatial encounters of a PF with the same PC. In a model of the cerebellar circuit, we then address the possibility that partial connectivity is a substrate of learning, i.e., a fixed, random mask that enforces diversity between PCs. We find that when considering "ensembles" of PCs, random partial connectivity can indeed outperform all-to-all connectivity. Our results provide a theoretical framework for understanding the role of partial connectivity between cerebellar PFs and PCs and may have implications for cerebellum-like systems and beyond.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.4%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 8%
11.6%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.6%
4
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.6%
5
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.6%
6
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.4%
8
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.9%
9
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.4%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.4%
11
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
12
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
13
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
15
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Journal of Cell Biology
392 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.0%
20
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
22
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
23
Progress in Neurobiology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%