Back

Evolutionary genomics of a natural Wolbachia superinfection in the dengue mosquito Aedes albopictus

Schmidt, T. L.; Martinez, J.; Day, J. P.; Sinkins, S. P.; Welch, J. J.; Jiggins, F. M.

2026-06-26 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.06.26.734713 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Aedes albopictus, an invasive mosquito vector of human pathogens, is naturally infected by two strains of the endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia, wAlbA and wAlbB. Here, we present a comprehensive genomic analysis of these Wolbachia strains, their associated plasmids, and host mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). We observed extensive variation in Wolbachia densities--spanning over three orders of magnitude--indicating that infections often exist at extremely low levels and this variation is largely driven by environmental factors. Phylogenetic analyses revealed concordant evolutionary histories among mitochondrial, Wolbachia, and plasmid genomes, with no strong evidence for horizontal or paternal transmission. We estimate that the common ancestor of the superinfection existed [~]6,000--9,000 years ago. Patterns of genetic structure and divergence indicate that the subsequent geographical spread of Wolbachia has mirrored host population history. Comparative rate analyses revealed that wAlbA evolves more slowly than wAlbB, consistent with a reduced mutation rate. Despite the close relationship between wAlbB lineages, gene content in this strain is highly variable, with 184 genes exhibiting presence-absence or copy number variation across strains, including genes involved in inducing cytoplasmic incompatibility. Several of these genes reside in repetitive or prophage regions, indicating that transposable elements appear to drive structural genomic variation in Wolbachia populations. Together, our results highlight extensive natural diversity within Wolbachia populations and provide a foundation for understanding symbiont dynamics in nature and to inform the selection of strains for Wolbachia-based vector control programs.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.