Back

Magnetic Levitation of Intact Tumor Biopsies Reveals Multivariate Biophysical Signatures of Breast Cancer Aggressiveness

Guzelgulgen, M.; Gunyuz, Z. E.; Anil-Inevi, M.; Pesen-Okvur, D.; Bolat-Kucukzeybek, B.; Gursoy, M.; Yalcin-Ozuysal, O.; Mese, G.; Ozcivici, E.

2026-06-27 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.26.734698 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Diagnostic assessment of breast cancer biopsies remains reliant on resource-intensive histopathology and molecular profiling, which often lack real-time physiological readouts. Magnetic levitation (MagLev) enables label-free density profiling of single cells, yet its application to intact tissue biopsies has been precluded by size-dependent geometric artifacts and the absence of analytical frameworks for biopsy-scale samples. Here, we report the first application of MagLev to intact invasive breast carcinoma biopsies (200-600 m) for biophysical profiling, generating multivariate biophysical signatures from 203 samples across 17 patients. We developed a physics-based size-correction algorithm (xmc) that isolates biological density from geometric artifact, and demonstrate that tissue viability is predicted not by average levitation height, but by spatial heterogeneity across replicate samples, reflecting the microenvironmental complexity of metabolically active tumors. Multivariate integration using Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression and Factor Analysis of Mixed Data (FAMD) identified nodal status (N) as the strongest biophysical predictor, suggesting that lymphatic dissemination capacity leaves a measurable signature in the primary tumor density profile. Unsupervised patient clustering in PLS-derived latent space recovered three clinically coherent subgroups aligned with molecular subtypes. This 30-minute, low-cost assay provides exploratory biophysical stratification complementary to existing diagnostics, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.7%
2
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
11.9%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.8%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 10%
5.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.2%
6
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
7
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
9
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
10
npj Imaging
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.5%
17
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
20
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
23
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
24
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Nature Materials
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
27
APL Bioengineering
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
28
BMC Methods
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
29
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%