Back

Evolutionary Stratification of Codon Usage Bias In Plants Arises from GC3 Composition and Translational Optimization

Mohanta, T. K.

2026-07-01 genomics
10.64898/2026.06.26.734692 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Codon usage bias is a fundamental genomic characteristic that prefers non-random preferential use of synonymous codons. It is a major determinant of translational efficiency, gene regulation, and molecular evolution. However, the evolutionary bias and functional relevance of codon usage bias across the plant lineage is poorly defined and yet to understand what are the major factors responsible for relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) in genomes and how codon usage bias influences the gene regulation, molecular evolution genomes. A genome-wide codon usage bias study of coding DNA sequences of 262 plant genome was conducted. It encompassed more than 4.6 billion codons from > 11 million coding sequences. Relative synonymous codon usage, codon adaptation index, codon-anticodon mapping, effective number of codon (ENC)-GC3, GC1,2-GC3, parity rule 2 (PR2-bias), molecular economy, and machine learning approaches were used for the study. It was found that codon usage bias was strongly non-random and exhibited a clear phylogenetic structuring. The higher plants favoured A/T-ending, whereas early-diverging lineages were enriched in G/C-ending codons. Analysis of RSCU, codon adaptation index, and codon-anticodon pairing indicated that translational selection is mediated by tRNA availability, contributing sustainability to these molecular patterns. Machine-learning approaches identified a small subset of codons having outsized influence on genome-wide codon usage landscapes. Further studies revealed the presence of robust inverse relationships between the effective number of codons and GC content at synonymous third positions. Neutrality analysis revealed approximately 61% of variation was driven by mutational pressure, tempered by selective constraints. Phylogenetic reconstruction showed a progressive relaxation of codon bias from algae to angiosperms while maintaining a conserved molecular economy cost of ~ 30 ATP per codon across the lineages. The study revealed codon usage bias is lineage-specific evolutionary conserved trait governed by mutation, selection, and translational optimization.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.5%
2
Journal of Molecular Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
3
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.7%
4
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.7%
5
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.8%
7
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
10
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.7%
11
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
12
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.5%
20
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
Molecular Genetics and Genomics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
22
Gene
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
24
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
25
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
26
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
28
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
29
Mitochondrion
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
30
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%