Back

Revising the genetic and epigenetic architecture of in vitro regeneration capacity in natural Arabidopsis thaliana populations

Arima, K.; Chen, Y.; Sugimoto, K.; Sasaki, E.

2026-07-01 genetics
10.64898/2026.06.26.734650 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plant regeneration is a dynamic developmental process that spans from cell dedifferentiation to organ reconstruction in response to inductive cues, such as wounding stress and hormonal signals. Although this capacity varies widely both between and within species, a comprehensive understanding of the genetic and epigenetic bases of this variation remains incomplete. To address this issue, we revisited published datasets on natural variation in in vitro regeneration capacity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Using quantitative genetic approaches, including meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and multi-locus models, we dissected the genetic architecture underlying regeneration traits. Our results showed that shoot regeneration capacity is primarily explained by allelic variation in the cis-regulatory region of WUSCHEL (WUS), a key regulator of shoot meristem formation. Notably, these polymorphisms are also associated with epigenetic variants of the DNA transposon ATDNA2T9C, which is located within the regulatory region. Furthermore, allelic variation in ARABIDOPSIS RESPONSE REGULATOR 2 (ARR2), a positive regulator of cytokinin signaling, is associated with callus formation and greening traits and may promote shoot formation through genetic interactions with WUS alleles. Although in vitro regeneration is controlled by complex, multilayered gene regulatory networks, our results suggest that, in A. thaliana, natural variation in regeneration capacity is largely shaped by a small number of major-effect modifiers together with epigenetic variation and genetic interactions, despite the substantial heterogeneity observed among natural populations.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.7%
2
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.4%
3
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.7%
4
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.7%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.1%
6
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 22%
2.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.3%
10
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
11
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
17
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
18
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.5%
19
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
20
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
21
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
22
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Plant and Cell Physiology
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
27
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
30
Molecular Plant
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%