Back

Where do the ligands bind? Co-folding bitter taste GPCRs with the BitterDB chemical space

Ziaikin, E.; Niv, M. Y.

2026-06-27 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.06.26.734512 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bitterness is a key taste modality mediated in vertebrates by TAS2R G-protein-coupled receptors, which also function in diverse extraoral tissues. Recent cryo-EM structures have revealed a non-classical intracellular pocket in TAS2R14, raising the question of whether ligand pocket choice can be predicted computationally and what sequence features control it. Here we evaluate the Boltz-2 co-folding framework on all currently available agonist-TAS2R cryo-EM complexes and show that it correctly identifies the experimentally observed binding pocket for 12 of 15 pairs, including intracellular binding that docking into predicted receptor models fails to reproduce. Focusing on aristolochic acid, which binds intracellularly to TAS2R14 and extracellularly to TAS2R43, we use a series of in silico morphing experiments to pinpoint transmembrane helices 3 and 7, and specific residues within them, as key determinants of pocket preference. Extending the analysis to [~]1,500 agonist-receptor associations from BitterDB, we find that while most receptors are predicted to bind agonists predominantly in the extracellular pocket, several TAS2Rs may have both extracellularly and intracellularly binding ligands. Finally, by fine-tuning the Boltz-2 affinity module on [~]7,000 positive and negative experimental data points, we obtain a TAS2R-specific classifier that improves AUROC from 0.54 to 0.82 and average precision from 0.24 to 0.58 on a validation set.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 2%
33.9%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.5%
3
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
5
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
6
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.1%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.7%
8
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.7%
9
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.6%
10
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
11
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
13
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
15
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
22
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
23
The EMBO Journal
309 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.6%
25
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
26
Cell Research
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%