Back

Comparing genomic inbreeding of an isolated rhesus macaque study population to wild populations

Pautet, F.; Freudiger, A.; Ruiz-Lambides, A.; Widdig, A.; Ringbauer, H.

2026-06-27 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.06.26.734461 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Long-term studies of isolated animal populations have greatly improved the understanding of various evolutionary processes. However, potentially elevated inbreeding in those compared to wild populations is a common concern. Conventionally, inbreeding has been investigated using reconstructed pedigrees, but nowadays it can be done directly at the genomic level. Here, we utilize genomic data from an intensively studied isolated rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) population on the small island Cayo Santiago (Puerto Rico), which was founded in 1938 with wild animals from India. We quantified inbreeding levels by inferring runs of homozygosity (ROH), i.e., long identical haplotypes inherited from both parents. We identified ROH in 97 ~5x-coverage genomes from Cayo Santiago and, for comparison, in 79 rhesus macaque genomes from five wild populations from China. Notably, this conventionally considered low-coverage data proved sufficient to infer ROHs >4 centimorgans long after imputing the genomes using a reference panel. Our results revealed that the ROH-derived effective population size on Cayo Santiago, 420 individuals, falls within the ranges we inferred in wild populations. Moreover, a general scarcity of individuals with long ROH in both the Cayo and wild populations indicates very few cases of close-kin breeding, suggesting that mechanisms to avoid close-kin breeding operate in rhesus macaques, both in wild and isolated populations. Taken together, our results suggest that Cayo Santiago remains a representative study population.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.2%
2
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
17.4%
3
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.9%
5
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.6%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 13%
4.1%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.0%
8
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
9
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.5%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.3%
12
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
13
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.8%
14
American Journal of Primatology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
15
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
21
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
22
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%