Back

System Identification and Control for Optogenetics in Mammalian Nucleocytoplasmic Transport

van Laarhoven, M.; Rates, A.; Passmore, J. B.; Shi, S.; Smal, I.; Kapitein, L. C.; Smith, C. S.

2026-06-27 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.26.734178 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Optogenetics enables experiments in out-of-equilibrium conditions to clarify biological mechanisms and quantify biophysical parameters. However, modelling and control techniques to study mammalian cell biology under optogenetic perturbation remain underutilised. Here, we benchmark these methods within mammalian cells by steering nucleocytoplasmic transport via the optogenetic LEXY protein in outcome-driven microscopy. First, we employ system identification to obtain models that predict transport dynamics by minimising the prediction error. We quantify this prediction accuracy for one biophysical model and two black-box models. Second, we evaluate closed-loop control efficacy by steering transport along a predefined trajectory using model-free Proportional Integral (PI) control, model-based Linear Quadratic Regulation (LQR) and Model Predictive Control (MPC). Both the predictive models and the applied control techniques demonstrate robust performance against cell-to-cell variation. This biological variation is quantified by the parameter distributions obtained from model identification with single-cell trajectories. While we show that model-free techniques such as PI and gain-scheduled PI achieve steering without explict model knowledge, predictive architectures offer better performance under this cell-to-cell variation and time-varying setpoints. Moreover, black-box predictive accuracy suggests that this model-based control is possible, even when explicit mechanistic understanding is missing. Ultimately, we demonstrate that predictive modelling and optogenetics enable quantitative characterisation and precise manipulation of mammalian cells, while offering practical guidelines for the implementation of these techniques.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 5%
9.7%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.6%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.2%
4
Journal of Cell Biology
392 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.4%
5
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
7
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.3%
8
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
10
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.2%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 19%
2.8%
12
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
13
Optics Express
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
14
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.4%
15
ACS Photonics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
16
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
17
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
18
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
20
npj Imaging
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
21
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
22
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
23
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
BMC Methods
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
Nano Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Optica
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%