Back

Redox-modulated bacterial deubiquitinase ElaD: Target recognition and suppression of K63-linked polyubiquitin accumulation in yeast.

Garg, L.; Shrivastava, A.; Barros, G. C.; Silva, G.; Ainavarapu, S. R. K.

2026-06-28 biophysics
10.64898/2026.06.26.730077 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bacterial deubiquitinases (DUBs) are important virulence effectors that manipulate host ubiquitin signaling during infection. ElaD, a CE-clan DUB expressed by enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli, preferentially cleaves K63-linked ubiquitin chains, yet its effects on conserved cellular stress responses remain poorly understood. We demonstrate that ElaD exhibits redox-dependent DUB activity in vitro. In addition, we identified the molecular basis underlying the selective recognition of substrate proteins, ubiquitin and NEDD8 by ElaD. Structural and mutational analyses reveal that, beyond the conserved catalytic site, ElaD engages ubiquitin through a combination of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a heterologous model system, we show that wild-type ElaD rescues the proteotoxic stress phenotype of ubp2{Delta} yeast cells, whereas specific ElaD mutants fail to confer a similar response. Furthermore, expression of ElaD suppresses oxidative stress-induced accumulation of K63-linked polyubiquitin and may perturb stress-associated translational regulation linked to K63 ubiquitin signaling. Consequently, cells expressing ElaD exhibit altered stress adaptation and diminished fitness during prolonged oxidative stress. Collectively, these findings indicate that ElaD perturbs ubiquitin-mediated stress signaling by counteracting K63-linked ubiquitination events that support adaptive cellular responses. Our study highlights how a bacterial DUB can reprogram conserved ubiquitin-dependent pathways and exploit host ubiquitin signaling networks to modulate cellular stress responses and protein homeostasis. These findings further suggest potential host targets of bacterial DUBs during infection.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.7%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.5%
3
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.4%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.6%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.0%
6
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.3%
7
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
9
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
10
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.1%
11
Traffic
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 15%
2.6%
13
The FEBS Journal
93 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
14
Biochemical Journal
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
15
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
16
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
17
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
18
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.3%
20
Molecular Microbiology
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
The EMBO Journal
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
22
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%