Back

Effectiveness of pharmacy-based HIV pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis delivery: a cluster-randomized trial in Kenya

Ortblad, K. F.; Meisner, A.; Omollo, V.; Kareithi, T.; Roche, S. D.; Ongwen, P.; Asewe, M.; Anyona, M. O.; Banerjee, P.; Curran, K.; Gichuru, E.; Harkey, K.; Juma, L.; Kiptinness, C.; Malen, R. C.; Mugambi, M. L.; Otieno, P.; Pintye, J.; Rono, B.; Schaafsma, T. T.; Shah, P. D.; Sharma, M.; Thomas, K. K.; Yu, K.; Were, D.; Bukusi, E. A.; Ngure, K.

2026-06-29 public and global health
10.64898/2026.06.26.26356703 medRxiv
Show abstract

Private pharmacies are ubiquitous yet underutilized for HIV pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP and PEP) delivery. In a cluster-randomized trial in Kenya (NCT05842122), we randomized 60 pharmacies 1:1:1:1 to: client-sustained delivery (~$2/visit user fee); implementor-sustained delivery (~$2/visit reimbursement); counselor-supported delivery (task shifting; ~$1/visit reimbursement); or clinic referral (control; ~$1/referral reimbursement). Commodities were supplied free to pharmacies from government stock. Primary outcomes were PrEP initiation and one-month continuation (any dispensing or refilling, respectively), self-reported by clients 60 days post-enrollment (multiple-comparisons threshold: p=0.017). From June 2023-April 2025, 5,808 clients enrolled; 64% were PEP candidates. Compared to referral, the counselor-supported arm had significantly higher PrEP initiation (RR=6.5, 95% CI [2.6, 16], p<0.001) and continuation rates (RR=5.1, 95% CI [1.4, 19], p=0.016); all intervention arms had significantly higher PEP initiation rates. One seroconversion, one social harm, and two provider needlestick injuries occurred. Pharmacy PrEP/PEP delivery outperformed clinic referral, particularly when fully subsidized and counselor-supported.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.8%
3
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 20%
5.6%
5
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
73 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.3%
9
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.5%
11
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
12
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
13
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Vaccine
203 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Drug Safety
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
AIDS and Behavior
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Clinical Trials
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
24
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%