Back

An Open, Reproducible Gamma-Variate Pipeline for CT-Perfusion Time-Attenuation Curve Analysis, with Standardized (ASIST-Japan) Map Visualization

Yamamoto, S.

2026-06-29 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.06.26.26356666 medRxiv
Show abstract

CT perfusion (CTP) is central to acute-stroke and oncologic imaging, yet quantitative outputs vary substantially across vendor software, undermining reproducibility. We present an open, transparent core (ctp-core) that fits first-pass time-attenuation curves with a gamma-variate model, derives perfusion indices (peak enhancement, time-to-peak, bolus-arrival time, and area under the curve) analytically from the fitted parameters, and renders parametric maps with the ASIST-Japan standardized lookup table (a-LUT) so that visualization is comparable across sites. Every parameter, bound, and processing step is exposed. The method is validated on Monte-Carlo synthetic curves with known ground truth; no confidential or patient data are used. Across signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) levels 5 to 100 (200 independent runs per level) the pipeline recovers peak time to within 0.03-0.52 s and peak amplitude to within 0.4-8.1% (mean absolute error), degrading monotonically with noise; at a representative SNR of 20 it recovers peak time within 0.13 s, peak amplitude within 2.0%, and bolus-arrival time within 0.51 s, with fit quality R-squared = 0.98. The reproducibility demonstration is deterministic (fixed seed) and re-runs to bit-stable metrics. All code, the synthetic-data generator, the standardized-visualization module, evaluation scripts, and a 34-test suite are released openly for independent verification. The contribution is a fully open, parameter-transparent gamma-variate plus standardized-visualization pipeline with reproducible synthetic benchmarks: a reference others can audit, reuse, and build on.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
2
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.7%
4
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.5%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.8%
7
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
9
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
12
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
13
Photoacoustics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
18
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Aperture Neuro
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
NMR in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
23
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
25
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
27
SLAS Technology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
28
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
29
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
30
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%