Back

Efficacy inference in early-phase non-controlled clinical trials via Bayesian biomarker deconvolution

Humphries, C.; Kilpatrick, A. M.; Cartwright, J. A.; Potter, C.; Fernando, A. J.; Candela, M. E.; Man, J.; Aird, R.; Simpson, K. J.; Lyall, M. J.; Starkey Lewis, P.; Rodriguez, A.; Weir, C. J.; Dear, J. W.; Forbes, S. J.; Schumacher, L. J.

2026-06-29 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.64898/2026.06.26.26356652 medRxiv
Show abstract

Early-phase clinical trials of therapies for acute organ injury are typically small, uncontrolled, and must infer treatment activity using only tissue-damage biomarker changes over time. Interpretation is confounded by the temporal overlap of ongoing tissue damage and biomarker clearance. We address this with a Bayesian deconvolution framework that fits individual patient biomarker trajectories with an exponentially-modified Gaussian model. This model separates injury kinetics (peak release rate, injury duration, time to peak) from biomarker clearance, using a historic cohort as a null distribution. In a simulated phase 1 dose-escalation regenerative therapy trial, the framework reduces the minimum detectable treatment effect from 67.5% to 24.5% (a 2.76-fold improvement) and supports dose selection. Applied to published case-series data for another therapeutic, the framework recovers per-patient pharmacodynamic signatures consistent with pre-clinical mechanistic studies and supports smaller prospective clinical trial design. With indication-specific recalibration, the framework architecture conceptually transfers to other acute organ injuries where serum biomarkers reflect tissue damage. This offers a route to significantly reducing clinical trial sizes, supporting therapy dose-finding in non-controlled clinical trials, and identifying pharmacodynamic signatures.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.2%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 7%
12.0%
3
Clinical and Translational Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.3%
6
Aging Cell
165 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.2%
9
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
10
Biometrics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
12
Statistics in Medicine
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.5%
15
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.1%
18
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
20
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
21
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
npj Genomic Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
23
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%