Back

To ban or not to ban social media for children? Beliefs and influencing factors among Greek parents

Katsiroumpa, A.; Moisoglou, I.; Gallos, P.; Galani, O.; Tsiachri, M.; Peleka, P.; Triantafillaki, A.; Kolisiati, A.; Galanis, P. A.

2026-07-09 public and global health
10.64898/2026.06.26.26356645 medRxiv
Show abstract

OBJECTIVE To examine parents perceptions regarding the introduction of a social media ban for children and to identify factors associated with these attitudes. METHOD A cross-sectional study was carried out in Greece in April 2026. Potential predictors of parents views on a social media ban included (a) sociodemographic variables (such as gender, age, educational attainment, and financial status), (b) social media usage patterns (number of accounts, daily usage duration, and posting frequency), and (c) level of political engagement (how often participants follow political news and discuss political issues). Outcome variables comprised parents agreement with the ban, level of awareness about its implementation, perceived necessity for additional measures, confidence in the ban effectiveness, perceived effects on children lives, and parents familiarity with digital parental control tools. RESULTS Overall, 68.0% of parents supported implementing a social media ban for children under 15. A large majority (91.8%) expressed the need for more governmental information regarding the ban. Additionally, 89.3% believed that further measures beyond the ban are required to effectively address the issue. Suggested measures included digital literacy courses in schools (86.1%), active parental involvement in digital literacy (74.6%), prohibition of inappropriate content (77.9%), reasonable parental limits on social media use (73.8%), and restriction of addictive platform features (73.0%). Older parents demonstrated greater confidence in the effectiveness of the ban. Furthermore, age, financial status, number of social media accounts, and time spent online were positively associated with perceived impacts of the ban. Younger age was linked to greater parental familiarity with digital control tools, while having more social media accounts was also positively associated with such familiarity. CONCLUSIONS There is a clear need for comprehensive, evidence-based policy approaches that combine regulation, education, and shared responsibility among stakeholders. Policymakers should leverage existing public support for child protection while investing in digital literacy initiatives, empowering parents, and strengthening regulatory oversight of social media platforms to achieve long-term and equitable results.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 9%
19.0%
2
European Journal of Public Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.3%
3
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.9%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Public Health
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Journal of Public Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Swiss Medical Weekly
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
10
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
14
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
15
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
18
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Eurosurveillance
83 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Public Health in Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%