Back

A Snakemake-based bacterial whole genome comparison pipeline for multi-group clinical isolates

Kim, H.; Sim, H. S.; Kim, J.; Kim, K.; Yeom, J.

2026-06-26 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.25.734687 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Organisms have continuously evolved in response to environmental conditions. Pathogenic bacteria evolve under host and environmental pressures, reshaping their genomes through insertions, inversions, deletions, and duplications during infection. In clinical settings, phenotypic traits of pathogenic bacteria such as virulence or antimicrobial resistance directly affect disease severity, transmission, and treatment. Conventional genotyping provides insights into genomic relatedness but does not always align with these clinically relevant traits, limiting its utility for phenotype-driven interventions. Here, we develop ABComp (Assembly polishing and Bacterial whole-genome Comparison for multi-group clinical isolates), a modular and Snakemake-based workflow for phenotype-driven comparative genomics. ABComp automates assembly polishing, group-wise pangenome analysis, and enables flexible pathogenic marker discovery through user-defined comparisons. We validated ABComp using a Klebsiella pneumoniae ground truth dataset stratified by yersiniabactin presence and successfully recovered the entire locus as a group-specific core marker. By applying ABComp to another dataset of clinical isolates with experimentally measured virulence, we discovered the ferric citrate (Fec) uptake system as a potential marker specific to a hypervirulent group. These results demonstrate ABComps utility in uncovering phenotype-linked genomic markers with clinical significance, supporting targeted treatments and rapid diagnosis.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 6%
21.7%
2
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 1%
11.8%
3
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.7%
4
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
5
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
7
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
9
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
11
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.4%
13
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.0%
15
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.7%
18
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
20
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
22
iMeta
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.6%
25
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%