Back

Shared genetic foundation of the DHEAS pathway indicate similar extended childhoods in Neanderthals and modern humans

Hartman, N. R.; Villanea, F. A.

2026-06-27 genomics
10.64898/2026.06.25.734583 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Adrenarche, the pre-pubertal rise in adrenal androgens, particularly dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfated form DHEAS, is a critical driver of middle childhood cognitive and social development in modern humans. Compared to other apes, modern human adrenarche is more prolonged, with higher DHEAS levels. Whether this uniquely prolonged human adrenarche is a derived trait of Homo sapiens or has deeper hominin roots remains unresolved. Here, we examine the Neanderthal genetic variation in five key DHEAS biosynthesis genes (HSD3B2, CYP17A1, POR, CYB5A, SULT2A1). We also examine archaic introgression in these genes by comparing high-coverage Neanderthal genomes with globally diverse modern human sequences from the 1000 Genomes Project. We identify 29 Neanderthal-derived single nucleotide variants across these genes. Key steroidogenic genes in the biosynthesis pathway show no evidence of introgression, consistent with selection on pleiotropic regulators of steroidogenesis. In contrast, accessory genes carried introgressed Neanderthal haplotypes at moderate frequencies in non-African human populations, indicating Neanderthal variants are compatible with the human DHEAS synthesis pathway. All Neanderthal-specific variants were in non-coding regions, with three variants associated with reduced enzyme efficiency or DHEAS production in adults. Additionally, for all 29 positions, the modern human major allele is ancestral, and there is no evidence for a suite of novel adrenarche-extending variants. We conclude that the genetic foundation for extended adrenarche is shared between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals, and may have deeper hominin roots. Any phenotypic variation in adrenarche between modern humans and Neanderthals is more likely attributable to differential gene expression than to divergence in protein-coding sequences.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 4%
18.1%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.6%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.5%
4
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.7%
5
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.2%
7
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
8
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
9
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
10
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
11
Cell Genomics
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
13
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
15
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
16
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Endocrinology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
18
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Epigenetics & Chromatin
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
20
Journal of the Endocrine Society
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.0%
22
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Human Molecular Genetics
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%