Back

Comparative genomics of the unusual arachnid order Solifugae spotlight the molecular and genetic basis for adaptations to arid habitats

Garcia, E. L.; Kulkarni, S. S.; Graham, M. R.; Santibanez-Lopez, C. E.; Sharma, P. P.

2026-06-29 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.06.25.734573 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The evolutionary transition to terrestrial life required overcoming several physiological hurdles; however, such challenges were amplified in desert environments. While several xeric-adapted arachnids utilize permanent burrows or "sit-and-wait" foraging strategies as possible energy conservation adaptations in harsh habitats, camel spiders exhibit a counterintuitive, high-energy lifestyle. To investigate the molecular underpinnings distinguishing Solifugae within Chelicerata, we utilized a comparative genomics framework that incorporates a newly sequenced, previously unpublished solifuge genome. We identified lineage-specific expanded orthogroups and evaluated selective pressures acting upon paralogous sequences within our ingroup solifuge species. Additionally, we also focused on fatty acid-associated proteins and heat shock proteins to elucidate how Solifugae may have evolved such anomalous behaviors compared to their arachnid relatives. Our analyses revealed significant signatures of positive selection within key gene families across the solifuge lineage. Notably, paralogs within the cytochrome P450 and biotinidase families showed consistent evidence of selection across all three taxa, suggesting specialized metabolic or detoxification requirements. Furthermore, we identified candidate loci implicated in axonal guidance and lipid metabolism, and a specialized fatty acid enzyme repertoire. While subsequent research is required to determine whether some of the genomic signatures unveiled here are shared across a broader phylogenetic distribution within Solifugae, we establish a critical baseline for future functional validation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.5%
2
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
15.1%
3
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
11.0%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
6
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
9
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
11
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
12
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.1%
14
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
15
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
19
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
21
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
24
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%