Back

Gram-negative-dominated polymicrobial microbiome of necrotizing soft tissue infections from North India: an integrated culture and 16S rRNA metagenomics prospective cohort study

Vashist, T.; Rana, N.; Nair, D.; Sharma, V.; Anil, A.; Tandup, C.; Ray, P.; Angrup, A.

2026-06-27 microbiology
10.64898/2026.06.25.734553 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) carry 10 to 30% mortality. Current empirical antimicrobial guidance derives almost entirely from Western cohorts dominated by Streptococcus pyogenes and aerobic-anaerobic consortia, yet whether this microbial paradigm applies to tropical, high-antimicrobial-pressure settings has not been tested with culture-independent methods. We did a prospective cohort study of 169 patients with intraoperatively confirmed NSTI at a North Indian tertiary center (2021 to 2024). Wound tissue underwent aerobic and anaerobic culture, QIIME2-based 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing (V3-V4), and targeted SYBR Green quantitative PCR (qPCR) for Acinetobacter baumannii and S. pyogenes. The wound microbiota was overwhelmingly Gram-negative and polymicrobial, anchored by A. baumannii (culture, 33.7%; metagenomics, 49.1%; qPCR, 37.9%), Escherichia coli (32.0%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (20.7%); S. pyogenes contributed only 4.7% of culture-positive cases. Polymicrobial wounds had higher Shannon diversity (2.59 versus 2.33; P = 0.048) and discrete community composition (PERMANOVA R2 = 0.511; P = 0.010). Culture-metagenomics agreement ranged from almost perfect for Escherichia ({kappa} = 0.849) to slight for Streptococcus ({kappa} = 0.131). North Indian NSTIs present a microbial picture distinct from the Western paradigm, with implications for empirical therapy.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
13.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.0%
3
Journal of Infection
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.6%
5
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.5%
6
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.3%
8
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.3%
10
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
11
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
12
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Journal of Medical Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
15
Emerging Infectious Diseases
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.3%
17
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
18
Access Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Journal of Hospital Infection
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Microbial Ecology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
24
BMC Research Notes
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
25
MicrobiologyOpen
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
Journal of Applied Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
27
Biofilm
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
28
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
The Lancet Microbe
44 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
30
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%