Back

Integrating Semantic Retrieval, LLM-based Refinement, and Structured Expert Curation for Scalable AOP Gene Mapping

Schaffert, A.; Fratello, M.; Kangas, K.; Torres Maia, M.; del Giudice, G.; Mobus, L.; Accardi, C.; Al-Abdulraheem, Z.; Campini, L.; Galardo, F.; Federico, A.; Ciancaleoni, G.; Juppi, H.-K.; Paparella, M.; Serra, A.; Greco, D.

2026-06-30 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.25.734475 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Toxicogenomics can support regulatory toxicology, but its use is limited by the difficulty of translating molecular responses into mechanistic, decision-relevant interpretations. Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) provide a framework for this translation, yet omics applications require scalable mapping of Key Events (KEs) to molecular features. Here, we present an AI-assisted, multi-step workflow for KE-to-gene mapping that uses embedding-based semantic retrieval to identify candidate ontology/pathway terms, large language model-assisted refinement to filter these candidates, and double-independent expert group curation with rule-based consolidation to finalize mappings and derive confidence scores. Compared with earlier NLP-based approaches, the workflow improves KE-to-ontology/pathway mapping performance and generates candidate annotations that better align with expert judgment while substantially reducing the need for manual augmentation. Explicit gene and protein mentions in KE titles were additionally grounded to improve specificity, and each curated mapping was assigned curator reason codes to support transparent, traceable, and confidence-aware reuse. Applied across AOP-Wiki, the workflow produced a comprehensive KE-to-gene set resource covering 1,254 KEs across 523 AOPs and linking 15,833 human genes. Utility is demonstrated through CTD-based AOP fingerprinting of curated reference chemical groups, highlighting expanded coverage and confidence-informed interpretation of chemical-associated gene signatures in an AOP context. The workflow and resulting resource provide a practical bridge between toxicogenomics and AOP-based mechanistic interpretation and support routine updating and future extension to additional omics layers within OECD Omics2AOP.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
7.9%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.3%
3
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.5%
4
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.2%
5
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.1%
7
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
8
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
9
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
10
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.9%
14
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
18
Journal of Cheminformatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
19
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
21
Database
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
23
Chemical Research in Toxicology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
24
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
Metabolites
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
26
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
27
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
28
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
29
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
30
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%