A number simplex in the human medial temporal lobe
Zhu, H.; Chericoni, A.; Ismail, T.; Mickiewicz, E.; Franch, M.; Nigam, T.; Yan, X.; Belanger, J.; Chavez, A. G.; Nair, J.; Paulo, D.; Bartoli, E.; Hennig, J. A.; Fraczek, T.; Provenza, N.; Yoo, S. B. M.; Sohn, H.; Cantlon, J.; Piantadosi, S.; Sheth, S.; Hayden, B. Y.
Show abstract
Humans handle numbers nimbly, suggesting a richer neural manifold structure than the prevalent mental number line model. In populations of medial temporal lobe (MTL) neurons in humans performing two simple tasks (dot counting and arithmetic), we find robust neural coding of numerosity that results in high dimensional, simplex-shaped manifolds. This shape affords more flexibility than a linear manifold due to its high shattering dimensionality and expressibility. Dot arrays and Arabic numerals evoked distinct simplicial population codes, yet they were linked by a linearly transferable latent structure within the same task. We find similar simplicial geometry of number representations in large language models (LLMs). Moreover, subjects internally computed arithmetic results were decodable during the calculation period, with decoding accuracy correlating with individual mathematical capacity. Finally, linear transformations of simplicial operand representations modeled the brains conversion of operands into decodable results, suggesting that the brains arithmetic procedures have some resemblance to the attention architecture of LLMs. Together, these findings establish a high dimensional representational foundation for numerical cognition in the brain.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Adaptive stretching of representations across brain regions and deep learning model layers 97%
- Interacting with volatile environments stabilizes hidden-state inference and its brain signatures 96%
- Inferring Latent Behavioral Strategy from the Representational Geometry of Prefrontal Cortex Activity 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.