Back

The etiology of mandibular anterior arch collapse and mesial molar drift: A preliminary study.

Boosalis Toaddy, E.; Marshall, S.; Mueldener, E.; Thomas, J. C.; Boger-Baird, K.; Southard, T. E.; Shin, K.

2026-06-29 dentistry and oral medicine
10.64898/2026.06.25.26356639 medRxiv
Show abstract

Relapse of aligned mandibular anterior teeth and the progressive collapse of the mandibular anterior arch are historically striking problems for orthodontists. The etiology of this collapse, and the cause of mesial molar drift, are unknown. However, light continuous (quasi-continuous) intra-oral pressures and forces applied to the mandibular dentition have been implicated. To explore this further, we use three-dimensional finite element analysis to investigate the influence of these intra-oral loads (tongue pressure, lip-cheek pressure, and interdental force) on mandibular arch collapse and mesial molar drift. Dentitions of three-dimensional finite element mandibular models were subjected to a wide range of simulated tongue pressures, lip-cheek pressures, and transseptal fiber-mediated interdental forces reported in the literature. Resulting crown displacement measurements from these isolated loads were made along with measurements resulting from simultaneous combined application of literature-defined mean tongue pressure, lip-cheek pressure, and interdental force. Our results indicate that tongue pressure alone results in generalized arch expansion and tooth spacing while lip-cheek pressure and interdental force result in generalized arch collapse, anterior crowding, and mesial molar displacement. Simultaneous application of tongue pressure, lip-cheek pressure, and interdental force mean values, as would occur in vivo, results in incisor crowding, intercanine width reduction, and mesial molar displacement. Our results suggest mandibular anterior arch collapse (incisor crowding / intercanine width reduction), and mesial molar displacement result from simultaneous application of tongue pressure, lip-cheek pressure, and interdental force.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 4%
33.3%
2
Journal of Dental Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.9%
5
Children
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
6
Journal of Anatomy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
7
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.3%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
11
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
12
BioMed Research International
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
13
Applied Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
14
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.9%
16
Journal of Medical Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
18
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
19
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
20
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
22
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%