Back

Recalibrating Mendelian randomization under winner's curse, sample structure and polygenicity

Yang, Y.; Lin, Z.; Xue, H.; Zhu, X.

2026-07-07 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.06.25.26356593 medRxiv
Show abstract

Recently, Hu et al. (2024) conducted a benchmarking study showing that most existing Mendelian randomization (MR) methods exhibit substantial bias and inflated type-I error rates in real data. They attributed these failures to two largely neglected sources of bias: winner's curse and polygenicity-induced bias. Although a few methods have been developed to address one or both of these issues, existing approaches either do not fully account for both biases or are restricted to the univariable setting. In this paper, we propose a multivariable Rao-Blackwellization that corrects winner's curse while accounting for polygenicity and sample structure in a unified framework. Unlike univariable Rao-Blackwellization, where instrument selection yields a truncated normal statistic amenable to a Mills-ratio correction, multivariable Rao-Blackwellization conditions on a noncentral $\chi^2$ statistic, for which no analogous correction is available. We derive closed-form conditional moments under this instrument selection model and use them to construct bias-corrected summary statistics that can be integrated into a wide range of existing MR methods. Simulations and real data analyses show that, when combined with methods such as MR-cML and MR-BEE, the proposed correction substantially improves type-I error control and yields more robust inference.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Statistics in Medicine
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
Biometrics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
3
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.6%
4
The Annals of Applied Statistics
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Genetic Epidemiology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Biostatistics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
7
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.2%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.5%
9
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.4%
10
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
11
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
16
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.3%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.0%
20
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Behavior Genetics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
26
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.8%
27
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
30
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%