Back

Sectoral Differences in Pediatric Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute Otitis Media

Hansas, J. B.; Csonka, P.; Karunadasa-Visama, M.; Vartiainen, P.; Vuorinen, A.-L.

2026-06-29 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.06.25.26356579 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Importance Acute otitis media is the most common infection in children and a major reason for antibiotic prescriptions, up to one third of which may be unnecessary. Sector of care may influence AOM management through differences in access to care, specialist involvement, parental expectations and financial foundation. Objective The objective is to examine differences in antibiotic prescribing practices between healthcare sectors. Design This is a nationwide register-based study comparing data from different healthcare sectors. Setting Finnish primary and secondary healthcare, covering both public- and private-sector visits. Prescriptions and sociodemographic information were linked from nationwide registers. Participants We included children under 18 years old who received a diagnosis of acute otitis media, defined by ICD-10 codes H65-H67, between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2022. Exposures The exposure is the sector of care (public sector vs. private sector). Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were antibiotic prescribing, guideline adherence of the prescribed antibiotics, and rates of management failure. Secondary outcomes included antibiotic selection and guideline-adherent eligibility for tympanostomy tube placement. Associations were estimated using adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The study included 295 064 children with 596 634 acute otitis media index visits, of which 77.6% resulted in an antibiotic prescription. Private-sector visits were associated with higher odds of antibiotic being prescribed (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.41-1.49). Overall, 87.3% of antibiotic prescriptions were guideline adherent, but private-sector care was associated with lower odds of guideline-adherent prescribing (aOR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.60-0.69). Compared with amoxicillin, the private sector showed higher odds of prescribing amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (32.8% vs. 8.3%; aOR: 3.00; 95% CI: 2.91-3.10). Management failure occurred in 7.0% of episodes and was more common in the private sector (aOR:1.52; 95% CI: 1.48-1.56). Only 48.7% of all tympanostomy tube insertions met the eligibility criteria. Conclusions and Relevance In this study overall adherence to guideline-recommended antibiotic treatment for AOM was high in Finland. Nevertheless, observed clinically meaningful sectoral differences in antibiotic selection, treatment failure, and tympanostomy eligibility adherence indicate a need for targeted antimicrobial stewardship and quality-improvement efforts, especially in the private sector.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.1%
2
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.0%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.0%
4
Children
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
BMJ Paediatrics Open
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
6
Archives of Disease in Childhood
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.9%
8
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Swiss Medical Weekly
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
10
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
The Journal of Pediatrics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
12
Eurosurveillance
83 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
13
Journal of Hospital Infection
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
14
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
16
Pediatrics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
18
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Vaccine
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Hearing Research
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
23
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
25
BMC Medical Education
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
62 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
29
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%