In-clinic validation of a smartphone-based finger tapping test for use in neurodegenerative and neurological populations.
O'Connor, M.; Sanderson-Cimino, M.; Li, Z.; Dhanam, S.; Sadarangani, A.; Downer, J.; Fregly, R.; Taylor, J.; Wise, A. B.; Casaletto, K. B.; Forsberg, L. K.; Gorno-Tempini, M. L.; Heuer, H. W.; Kramer, J. H.; Kornak, J.; Miller, B. L.; Paolillo, E. W.; Bove, R.; Rabinovici, G.; Seeley, W. W.; Boeve, B. F.; Rosen, H. J.; Boxer, A. L.; Staffaroni, A. M.
Show abstract
Background: Motor disturbances are common in neurologic and neurodegenerative syndromes. A standard motor speed and dexterity measure is the finger tapping test (FTT). The FTT has traditionally been administered in clinic using a mechanical FTT, limiting accessibility and early motor change quantification. This study assessed the validity of a smartphone app-based FTT, which may expand access and enable more frequent testing. Methods: The cohort was diagnostically diverse, including participants with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal syndrome, primary progressive aphasia, multiple sclerosis, and clinically unimpaired controls. Participants completed a 20-second ALLFTD Mobile App (mApp)-FTT with each hand. Tapping speed metrics were extracted. Participants completed the gold-standard mechanical FTT, a neurologist-administered finger tapping exam, the PSP Rating Scale (PSPRS) and the Unified Parkinson`s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Correlations assessed mApp-FTT and mechanical FTT relationships; regressions evaluated associations with neurologist-rated finger tapping impairment, PSPRS and UPDRS, adjusting for age and sex. Results: The mApp-FTT showed moderate-to-strong correlations with the mechanical FTT (dominant: r=0.63, p<0.001; non-dominant: r=0.55, p<0.001). Taps per second were associated with PSPRS motor severity (dominant hand: std. {beta}=-0.59, 95% CI [-0.91, -0.27], p<0.001) and the UPDRS (dominant hand: std. {beta}=-0.41, 95% CI [-0.82, 0.00], p=0.049). Flight time was modestly associated with neurologist-rated finger tapping impairment (dominant hand: std. {beta}=0.15, 95% CI [0.00, 0.29], p=0.044). Conclusion: These findings support mApp-FTT validity as a measure of motor function across neurodegenerative conditions. Validation in longitudinal and unsupervised remote settings is warranted to understand scalability and evaluate change over time.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Online unsupervised performance-based cognitive testing: a feasible and reliable approach to scalable cognitive phenotyping of Parkinson’s patients 96%
- A validated measure of rigidity in Parkinson's Disease using alternating finger tapping on an engineered keyboard 95%
- Predicting Longitudinal Disease Severity for Individuals with Parkinson's Disease using Functional MRI and Machine Learning Prognostic Models 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Smartphone-Based Symbol-Digit Modalities Test Reliably Measures Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis Patients 94%
- Quantifying Device Type and Handedness Biases in a Remote Parkinson’s Disease AI-Powered Assessment 93%
- A Remote Digital Memory Composite to Detect Cognitive Impairment in Memory Clinic Samples in Unsupervised Settings using Mobile Devices 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.