Back

In-clinic validation of a smartphone-based finger tapping test for use in neurodegenerative and neurological populations.

O'Connor, M.; Sanderson-Cimino, M.; Li, Z.; Dhanam, S.; Sadarangani, A.; Downer, J.; Fregly, R.; Taylor, J.; Wise, A. B.; Casaletto, K. B.; Forsberg, L. K.; Gorno-Tempini, M. L.; Heuer, H. W.; Kramer, J. H.; Kornak, J.; Miller, B. L.; Paolillo, E. W.; Bove, R.; Rabinovici, G.; Seeley, W. W.; Boeve, B. F.; Rosen, H. J.; Boxer, A. L.; Staffaroni, A. M.

2026-07-07 neurology
10.64898/2026.06.25.26356467 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Motor disturbances are common in neurologic and neurodegenerative syndromes. A standard motor speed and dexterity measure is the finger tapping test (FTT). The FTT has traditionally been administered in clinic using a mechanical FTT, limiting accessibility and early motor change quantification. This study assessed the validity of a smartphone app-based FTT, which may expand access and enable more frequent testing. Methods: The cohort was diagnostically diverse, including participants with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal syndrome, primary progressive aphasia, multiple sclerosis, and clinically unimpaired controls. Participants completed a 20-second ALLFTD Mobile App (mApp)-FTT with each hand. Tapping speed metrics were extracted. Participants completed the gold-standard mechanical FTT, a neurologist-administered finger tapping exam, the PSP Rating Scale (PSPRS) and the Unified Parkinson`s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Correlations assessed mApp-FTT and mechanical FTT relationships; regressions evaluated associations with neurologist-rated finger tapping impairment, PSPRS and UPDRS, adjusting for age and sex. Results: The mApp-FTT showed moderate-to-strong correlations with the mechanical FTT (dominant: r=0.63, p<0.001; non-dominant: r=0.55, p<0.001). Taps per second were associated with PSPRS motor severity (dominant hand: std. {beta}=-0.59, 95% CI [-0.91, -0.27], p<0.001) and the UPDRS (dominant hand: std. {beta}=-0.41, 95% CI [-0.82, 0.00], p=0.049). Flight time was modestly associated with neurologist-rated finger tapping impairment (dominant hand: std. {beta}=0.15, 95% CI [0.00, 0.29], p=0.044). Conclusion: These findings support mApp-FTT validity as a measure of motor function across neurodegenerative conditions. Validation in longitudinal and unsupervised remote settings is warranted to understand scalability and evaluate change over time.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.6%
2
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
3
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
4
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.4%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.1%
6
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.4%
8
Behavior Research Methods
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
9
Gait & Posture
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
12
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
13
Journal of Parkinson’s Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
14
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
16
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
npj Parkinson's Disease
105 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
19
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
20
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
21
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
74 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
22
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
23
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
24
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
25
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%