Back

Gene regulatory divergence underlies tissue-specific and sex-specific misexpression in interspecies nematode hybrids

Viswanath, A.; Fusca, D. D.; Calarco, J. A.; Cutter, A. D.

2026-06-30 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.06.24.734386 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Gene regulatory divergence has emerged as a key feature in speciation, influencing gene expression differences that accumulate between diverging populations. Transcriptional regulation, mediated by cis- and trans-acting factors, modulates diverse developmental processes and is responsible for distinct species-specific gene expression profiles. Within interspecies hybrid individuals, negative interactions between divergent cis- and trans-acting factors can lead to gene misregulation and hybrid dysfunction at the organismal level. Such gene regulatory mismatch might disproportionately impact sex-biased and tissue-biased gene regulatory networks due to their unique selective pressures. To address these issues, we investigated the role of regulatory divergence in asymmetric hybrid incompatibility between sister species of Caenorhabditis nematodes (C. remanei, C. latens) by analyzing gene expression of reciprocal hybrids for each sex and key tissue types. Despite severe hybrid male sterility, hybrid males showed less misexpression of sex-biased genes than hybrid females, suggesting that the organismal phenotypic outputs of male-biased gene regulatory networks are more vulnerable to disruption than female-biased genetic networks. Additionally, we found more genes associated with cis- than trans-regulatory divergence, supporting the notion of a disproportionate role for cis-regulatory divergence between species. Moreover, we document extensive cis-trans compensatory X-linked regulatory divergence specifically from male transcriptomes, indicating distinct molecular evolutionary outcomes of stabilizing selection on regulatory controls in males and females. These insights derived from asymmetric hybrid misexpression expand our understanding of the evolution of sex-biased gene regulation in the face of stabilizing selection and identify candidate genes contributing to Caenorhabditis post-zygotic reproductive isolation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
21.1%
2
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
3
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.3%
4
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.6%
5
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.3%
7
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.7%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.7%
9
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 14%
3.9%
11
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
12
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.7%
13
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.6%
14
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
18
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
19
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.8%
21
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
22
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
24
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
26
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
28
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%