Back

Intra-African Geographic Domain Shift in Wildlife Camera Trap Species Classification: A Comparative Study of Supervised and Zero-Shot Foundation Models

Nanduri, N.; Ogundare, J.; Anderson, G.

2026-06-25 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.24.734283 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Camera trap networks such as Snapshot Safari have generated millions of labelled wildlife images across Africa, enabling the training of deep learning models for automated species classification. However, deploying models trained in one African region to another remains poorly understood. To the best of our knowledge, this study presents the first systematic evaluation of geographic domain shift within the African continent for wildlife camera trap species classification, using the Machine Learning sub-field of Artificial Intelligence. We use three model architectures, each interacting with Snapshot Serengeti in a different way: BEiTV2is fine-tuned on Serengeti images as a supervised baseline; DINOv2 with FAISS uses Serengeti images as a retrieval index without any weight updates; and BioCLIP is a true zero-shot foundation model that receives no Serengeti training data at all. All three are then evaluated on two Southern African test sets, Snapshot Kgalagadi and Snapshot Kruger, as well as on locally collected wildlife photographs from Botswana. We conduct eight experiments covering in-domain baselines, cross-dataset transfer, data scaling, MegaDetector preprocessing, grayscale vs. colour image conditions, and per-species transfer analysis. This work provides the first empirical characterisation of intra-African domain shift across both supervised and zero-shot architectures, and offers practical guidance for conservation AI practitioners who need to deploy models across the diverse ecosystems of Southern Africa without collecting new labelled data.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.8%
4
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.9%
5
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.1%
8
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
10
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.5%
12
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
Conservation Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
18
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.0%
21
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%
24
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Conservation Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
26
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%