Back

Inherent Biomechanical Properties of the Lung: In vivo-Ex vivo Comparisons in Mice

Di Palo, J.; Ibinson, J. T.; Lin, L.; Suh, B.; Gwin, M. S.; Zaeh, S.; Szafron, J. M.; Manning, E. P.

2026-06-29 physiology
10.64898/2026.06.24.734270 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mammalian lungs operate within a thoracic cage composed of parietal pleura, rib cage, skeletal muscle, and diaphragm, yet clinical ventilator metrics largely reflect the combined mechanics of lung and surrounding structures and the thoracic cage. We hypothesized that thoracic boundary conditions selectively alter measured lung biomechanics. We performed paired pulmonary function testing (FlexiVent) in C57BL6 mice of both sexes spanning development through adulthood, measuring quasi-static pressure-volume behavior and dynamic forced-oscillation parameters in vivo (supine, mechanically ventilated) and again ex vivo in the same lungs. In a subset, we additionally compared in vivo and ex vivo microCT-derived lung volumes, including a pressure-fixed ex vivo protocol using snap freezing at controlled inflation pressure. Quasi-static pressure-volume curves were similar between conditions, with near-identity at higher pressures and only modest divergence at low pressures, consistent with thoracic structures primarily modulating recruitment/de-recruitment rather than intrinsic elastic recoil. Maximal volume at 30 cmH2O showed strong in vivo-ex vivo correlation and minimal bias, and static compliance and PV-loop hysteresis exhibited small biases relative to reported disease-model effect sizes. In contrast, dynamic mechanics demonstrated a clear in vivo elevation of tissue damping (G) with only modest change in tissue elastance (H) and little change in Newtonian resistance (Rn), producing a meaningful increase in hysteresivity (G/H). This dissociation implicates frequency-dependent mechanical heterogeneity (time-constant mismatch/pendelluft) imposed or amplified by nonuniform thoracic loading. Ex vivo microCT enabled reliable whole-lung segmentation and correlated with ex vivo PFT volumes at matched pressures, whereas in vivo volumetry showed weaker agreement. These results indicate that thoracic structures contribute modest restriction but disproportionately increase dynamic dissipation and heterogeneity, suggesting that ex vivo functional testing and oscillometry-like metrics may better detect biomechanical changes inherent to lung parenchyma.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.1%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.9%
4
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.5%
6
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.9%
9
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
10
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.2%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.0%
13
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
14
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
Circulation Research
47 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%
17
Experimental Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.8%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
22
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
23
Mucosal Immunology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
The Journal of Pediatrics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
Pulmonary Circulation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%