Back

Insect COI barcoding data as an untapped resource for surveying Wolbachia symbioses

Nowak, K. H.; Buczek, M.; Marszałek, M.; Prus-Frankowska, M.; Valdivia, C.; Deng, J.; Shropshire, J. D.; Łukasik, P.

2026-06-25 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.24.734267 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIDNA barcoding of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene is widely used to characterise insect diversity and distributions; however, its potential to reveal information on species interactions, including host-symbiont associations, remains largely unexplored. Here, we assess whether COI amplicon data can be used to identify Wolbachia - one of the most widely distributed bacterial symbionts known to profoundly affect their hosts biology. C_LIO_LIWe demonstrate that several commonly used invertebrate COI primer sets perfectly match many reference Wolbachia genomes, leading to frequent co-amplification. C_LIO_LIBy screening 7,901 individual-insect COI amplicon libraries obtained with the popular BF3-BR2 primer set, we detected Wolbachia sequences in over 35% of samples, revealing that co-amplification is indeed widespread. After removing low-abundance reads, Wolbachia detection based on COI amplicons showed over 90% agreement with simultaneously generated 16S-V4 rRNA amplicon data from the same specimens. The degree of agreement, however, varied depending on the thresholds used, among datasets and insect clades. C_LIO_LIFurther, we show that Wolbachia abundance inferred from COI amplicons correlated with their abundance in metagenomic datasets for 152 specimens, supporting the quantitative relevance of the signal. C_LIO_LIFinally, we find that Wolbachia COI sequences provide greater phylogenetic resolution than 16S-V4 rRNA data (mean pairwise genetic distance of COI sequences - 9.6%, 16S-V4 rRNA - 2.8%), and the reconstructed Wolbachia COI-based genotype network largely agrees with genome-based phylogenies. C_LIO_LICollectively, our results demonstrate that off-target Wolbachia sequences recovered from standard insect COI barcoding data may reliably detect symbiont presence, provide phylogenetic insight, and guide sample selection for metagenomics. Given the rapid expansion of global insect barcoding initiatives, these findings highlight an opportunity for cost-effective monitoring of their most prevalent bacterial symbionts, offering new perspectives on how host-microbe interactions may shape insect communities. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.5%
2
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.7%
3
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.1%
5
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
6
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.3%
7
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
8
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
9
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
11
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
12
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
13
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
14
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.3%
15
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
16
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
17
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.4%
19
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.3%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
22
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
23
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
24
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
25
Animal Microbiome
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
26
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
27
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
29
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
30
Journal of Invertebrate Pathology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%