Back

The dual Ewald sphere reconstruction for cryoEM

Heymann, B.

2026-06-25 Molecular Biology
10.64898/2026.06.24.734255 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Images in the electron microscope are formed by electron scattering and focusing. The spherical geometry of these processes gives rise to two coherent, conjugate spherical wave fronts, known as Ewald spheres. These spheres are associated with the two halves of the contrast transfer function (CTF), and their widths are determined by the focal gradient through the specimen. To properly correct for the CTF, each half of the CTF must be applied to an image individually and integrated into the reconstruction into the corresponding Ewald sphere. Theory indicates that this dual Ewald sphere reconstruction method should recover the maximal amount of information possible. This method was compared to the other reconstruction methods commonly used: the projection approximation (ignoring the Ewald sphere), the simple insertion and the single sideband methods. In simulated reconstructions the dual Ewald sphere method recovered the most information when the correct half of the CTF is matched to the corresponding Ewald sphere. If the wrong half is matched, the result worse than the projection approximation method. Examining reconstructions from real data indicated that the dual Ewald sphere method performs at least as well as the simple insertion method, but not as good as in simulations. The likely reason is the two-fold ambiguity in the assigned orientations of the particle images, which remains an issue to pursue in further studies. In conclusion, the dual Ewald sphere reconstruction method may offer the best way to calculate very high resolution reconstructions when the micrograph quality warrants it. HighlightsO_LIThe dual Ewald sphere reconstruction corrects for the two halves of the CTF. C_LIO_LIThe signs of the two halves of the CTF must correspond to the focal gradient. C_LIO_LIDetermining the focal gradient for individual particle images remains unresolved. C_LIO_LIComplex reconstructions indicate any real space phases are artifacts. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 1%
16.3%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.8%
3
Journal of Structural Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Microscopy and Microanalysis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
6
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
7
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
9
Journal of Microscopy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
11
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.5%
13
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
15
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
17
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
19
Journal of Structural Biology: X
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
21
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
28
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
29
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%