Back

Assessing the influence of edge effects on macrofaunal contributions to decomposition rates across forest-field ecotones.

Niles, T. E.; Taheri, C.; Buchkowski, R. W.

2026-06-25 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.24.734239 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding the relationships between soil macrofauna and decomposition is crucial for predicting how land-use change impacts ecosystem function in fragmented systems. This is because soil macrofauna affect decomposition and also respond to the changes in abiotic conditions across habitat gradients. This study investigates edge effects on the macrofauna contributions to decomposition across forest-field ecotones. We used bait lamina assay to quantify aboveground and belowground feeding activity of soil macrofauna in Autumn 2025 in three deciduous forest-old field ecotones and one coniferous forest-old field ecotone, in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. Vegetation diversity and composition, LAI and soil characteristics (i.e., soil organic matter, pH, temperature and moisture) were measured at each plot along the ecotone. Pitfall trap data collected in Summer 2025 at the same sites were used to characterize macrofauna communities. We used generalized linear mixed effects models to estimate the effect of distance to edge, site, and depth into the soil on bait lamina consumption and soil macrofauna, with transect nested within site as random effects. Consumption activity increased with distance into the forest from the field, with the edge representing an intermediate; and, decreased with increasing depth into the soil. In contrast, soil macrofauna abundance, especially isopods, decrease with distance into the forest from the field. These trends varied significantly across sites, so that consumption activity and abundance sometimes remained constant across the ecotone (i.e., site x distance interaction). The results demonstrate that macrofaunal contributions to bait consumption varied along the ecotone, shaped by interacting environmental gradients and shifts in community composition unique to each site.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
3
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
4
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
9
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
12
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
13
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
16
Applied Soil Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
21
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
25
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.8%
27
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
28
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
29
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
30
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%