Back

A microscopy-based readout to assess tumour-specific viability in neuroblastoma co-cultures and short-term cultured patient samples

Schoonbeek, M.;Valova, S.;Swaak, S.;Looze, E.;Watzeels, M.;Brink, L.;Roman, M.;Velzen, J.;ODuibhir, E.;Langenberg, K.;Wienke, J.;Hooff, S.;Boogaard, M.;Eising, S.;Molenaar, J.

2026-07-09 Cancer Biology
10.64898/2026.06.24.734168 bioRxiv
Show abstract

High-risk neuroblastoma patients face poor survival despite intensive treatment. Drug testing using patient-derived models can support therapy prioritization for precision medicine and drug development. Models incorporating tumour microenvironmental components, such as co-cultures and short-term cultured patient samples containing substantial non-malignant cell fractions, could better recapitulate microenvironment-dependent drug responses. However, conventional viability assays measure the combined signal from all viable cells in a well and therefore cannot determine tumour-specific drug responses. Here, we establish a microscopy-based readout to quantify cell-type-specific viability in two complementary settings: neuroblastoma-PBMC co-cultures and freshly dissociated patient tumour samples. In the co-cultures, PBMCs were pre-labelled with a cell-tracking dye, and Calcein staining was used to independently quantify the viability of tumour cells and PBMCs in the same well. The Calcein-based viability readout correlated strongly with conventional CellTiter-Glo measurements and was compatible with automated high-throughput drug screening. The imaging workflow enabled identification of compounds with differential efficacy in co-culture versus monoculture and distinguished tumour-specific effects from PBMC toxicity. The microscopy-based viability readout was further adapted to short-term cultured patient samples. Neuroblastoma tumour cells were distinguished from the non-malignant cells using a combination of tumour-specific surface markers NCAM, L1CAM and B7H3. This enabled determination of tumour fractions and measurement of tumour-specific drug responses. Tumour fractions varied substantially between patient samples, highlighting the importance of tumour-specific viability measurements. Together, the microscopy-based viability readout for co-cultures and patient samples enables scalable assessment of tumour-specific drug responses.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.1%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.2%
3
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.0%
4
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.8%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 20%
5.7%
6
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.4%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.4%
8
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
9
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
11
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.5%
12
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
13
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
14
Cell Communication and Signaling
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.5%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
17
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
EMBO Molecular Medicine
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
23
npj Imaging
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
25
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
28
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
29
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
30
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%