Back

Crossmodal Expectations in Material Perception

Malik, A.; Kolmel, L.; Billino, J.; Doerschner, K.

2026-06-29 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.24.734160 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Humans rely on multiple sensory modalities, such as vision, audition, and touch, to perceive materials in everyday life. Previous research shows that multisensory perception leads to facilitation, yet the mechanisms responsible for this facilitation remain poorly understood. One potential mechanism is crossmodal prediction, whereby input from one modality generates predictions about another. While substantial research on multisensory facilitation has focused on bottom-up processes, such as spatial, temporal, and semantic congruency, the role of crossmodal predictions, particularly in material perception, has received little attention. To address this gap, we conducted two experiments, a reaction time task and a material rating task, in which participants viewed computer-generated animations of familiar objects being dropped to the ground. The paradigm exploited the natural temporal structure of impact events: pre-impact visual appearance provides information about an objects material and therefore can generate expectations about the forthcoming impact sound. Critically, participants saw the event only until before the impact, after which the video was masked. Thus, vision and audition were temporally aligned but not presented concurrently, allowing us to isolate the influence of visually driven expectations on the incoming auditory information without a bottom-up conflict. In some trials, the sound matched the expected material, but in a subset, it was incongruent, violating expectations elicited by the preceding visual information. Across both experiments, participants took longer to respond on incongruent than congruent trials, suggesting increased processing demands. In the rating task, incongruent trials also shifted material judgments, such that ratings reflected a weighted combination of incoming auditory information and visually driven predictions, with large individual differences in relative cue weighting. These findings suggest that priors on material properties from one modality, specifically vision, not only establish high-level expectations within the modality about an objects future state, but also extend across modalities.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 8%
7.6%
4
Psychological Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.3%
6
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.4%
9
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.1%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.1%
12
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
14
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.0%
16
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.0%
17
Communications Psychology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Neuroscience of Consciousness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
20
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
21
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
23
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
25
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
26
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
27
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
30
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%