Back

Genetic Association of Somatic Incompatibility and NLR-like Protein Domains in Coprinopsis cinerea

Auxier, B.; Ament Velasquez, L.; Baars, J. J. P.; Scholtmeijer, K.; F. van Peer, A.; Debets, A. J.; Aanen, D. K.

2026-06-27 genetics
10.64898/2026.06.24.733965 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In fungi, hyphal fusion is beneficial within an individual, but fusion between individuals comes with the risks of infection or exploitation. To manage this risk, fungi have developed mechanisms to restrict sustained fusion to be within a genetic individual, called allorecognition. In Ascomycete fungi, this recognition is based on allelic identity at several polymorphic allorecognition genes, often triggering cell death. However, the genetic basis of allorecognition is unknown in basidiomycetes, the clade that includes mushroom-forming fungi. Here, we map the first locus for this trait, which we call somA, in the mushroom-forming fungus Coprinopsis cinerea. We combined F1 offspring phenotypes with independent backcross lines to identify a region on chromosome 5 linked with the production of a barrage zone, a classic allorecognition phenotype. Fine-mapping of this region resulted in a region with a set of kinases and NACHT domain proteins, flanked by a leucine-rich repeat (LRR) protein. While the NACHT and kinase proteins are diverse between the parents, the LRR-encoding protein shows signs of purifying selection. Additional C. cinerea genomes show that this region contains several highly divergent alleles, consistent with long-term balancing selection. These polymorphic alleles all contain a single monomorphic LRR, which may indicate a novel mechanism for fungal nonself recognition. Based on a phylogenetic survey of related Basidiomycetes, this specific locus architecture appears to be restricted to closely related species. This finding of a multiallelic locus may explain the general trend of few nonself recognition loci in basidiomycetes. These results provide a first understanding of how individuality is maintained in basidiomycetes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
15.0%
2
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
11.9%
3
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.9%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.8%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.5%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.1%
8
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.8%
9
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.5%
14
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
16
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.1%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
18
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
19
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
20
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.8%
23
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%