Back

Dominance of metabolically flexible fermenters drives intestinal gas production in Crohn's disease

Stubbusch, A. K. M.; Welsh, C.; Li, L.; Katayama, Y.; Giles, E. M.; Vu, T. M.; Makalic, E.; Rossetto Marcelino, V.; Forster, S.; Greening, C.

2026-06-25 microbiology
10.64898/2026.06.24.733704 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Molecular hydrogen (H2) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) are central gut metabolites that shape microbial metabolism and affect host health. In Crohns disease (CD), the shift in microbiota composition ( dysbiosis) is associated with intestinal accumulation of these gases, but the responsible microbes remain poorly resolved. Here, we analysed 4,644 bacterial and archaeal species-level genomes from the Unified Human Gastrointestinal Genome Collection to identify H2-cycling microbes, assessed their prevalence in ca. 1,700 stool metagenomes from healthy and diseased individuals, and validated their activity using culture-based incubations of stool isolates and biopsy samples. Approximately half of all species encoded H2-producing abilities, with acetate- and propionate-forming fermenters such as Phocaeicola and Bacteroides dominating healthy cohorts, whereas comparatively few taxa, including Escherichia and Megamonas, encoded H2 consuming abilities. In CD, H2 producers became more abundant but less diverse, favouring species with multiple H2-evolving hydrogenases and more fermentation routes, especially Clostridium and Enterocloster species. Consistently, isolates enriched in CD produced H2 faster and at higher concentrations than health-associated isolates. Increased H2S-producing capacity in CD was driven mainly by these H2-producing fermenters carrying anaerobic sulfite reductases (Asr), rather than sulfate-reducing bacteria, and was supported by elevated H2S production in Asr-positive isolates, likely providing an additional electron sink. These findings provide a species-resolved view of gut gas metabolism and implicate metabolically flexible fermenters in excessive gas and sulfide production in gut disorders.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.4%
2
Gut Microbes
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.5%
3
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.1%
4
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.6%
5
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.1%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 12%
4.4%
7
Cell Host & Microbe
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cell Host & Microbe
116 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
9
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.4%
10
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 13%
3.2%
11
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.4%
13
Gastroenterology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
Gut
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
15
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Gastro Hep Advances
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
18
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
20
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
21
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
22
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
23
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
26
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
27
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
28
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.8%
29
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
30
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%