Back

Arterial Elasticity and Cardiac Function: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Vara- Skövde Cohort

Szalo, G.; Bollano, E.; Ottarsdottir, K.; Radholm, K.; Li, Y.; Allison, M. A.; Brumback, L. C.; Hellgren, M. I.; Lindblad, U.; Daka, B.

2026-06-29 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.24.26356501 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: Diastolic pulse wave analysis provides non-invasive indices of arterial elasticity, but their associations with cardiac structure and function remain incompletely understood. Objective: To examine associations between arterial elasticity assessed by diastolic pulse wave analysis and echocardiographic measures of cardiac structure and function in a community-based cohort. Methods: A population-based cohort recruited 2816 randomly selected men and women aged 30-75 years between 2002 and 2005. A random subsample (n = 1,035) underwent echocardiography by a single senior cardiologist. Large-artery elasticity (C1) and small-artery elasticity (C2) were assessed by radial artery applanation tonometry. The analytical sample included 991 participants. Associations were examined using multivariable linear and logistic regression with sequential adjustment. The final model included sex, age, heart rate, diabetes mellitus, LDL cholesterol, body mass index, antihypertensive medication use, current smoking, alcohol intake, leisure-time physical activity, and systolic blood pressure. Results: Among 991 participants, mean age was 51 years, 488 were men, and 160 had left ventricular hypertrophy. Mean C1 was 16.0 {+/-} 5.1 mL/mmHg x 10, mean C2 was 6.9 {+/-} 3.5 mL/mmHg x 100, and mean EF was 73.4 {+/-} 8.5%. Higher C2 was associated with higher EF after systolic blood pressure adjustment ({beta} per 1-SD increase: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.5-1.9; p < 0.001). Higher C1 was associated with lower odds of left ventricular hypertrophy (OR per 1-SD increase: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.44-0.84; p = 0.003). Conclusions: Higher C2 was associated with better systolic function, whereas higher C1 was associated with lower odds of left ventricular hypertrophy.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
15.4%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.4%
4
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
5
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.6%
7
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.1%
9
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
10
Journal of Hypertension
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
14
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
15
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
17
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
19
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
20
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%