Back

Cohort profile: The Swedish Evaluation Through Follow-up Study of Learning Later in Life (UGU-LIFE)

Hansson, I.; Berg, A. I.; Bjalkebring, P.; Buratti, S.; Buren, J.; Hassing, L.; Jonsson, A.-C.; Jonsson, L.; Lindwall, M.; Segerberg, A.; Thorvaldsson, V.; Landen, M.; Klapp, A.; Lovden, M.

2026-07-01 public and global health
10.64898/2026.06.24.26356445 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: The Swedish Evaluation Through Follow-up study of Learning Later in Life (UGU-LIFE) was established to study the factors that shape lifelong learning and advance evidence-based means to facilitate learning in older age. Participants: UGU-LIFE builds on the Evaluation Through Follow-up (Utvardering Genom Uppfoljning, UGU, in Swedish) study, which consists of nationally representative samples of Swedish birth cohorts. The two oldest cohorts, born 1948 (N = 11,945) and 1953 (N = 9,927), were assessed at age 13 years and invited for follow-up assessments as part of UGU-LIFE in 2025 (age 72/77 years; N = 5,738). Findings to date: Data collection in childhood included a survey (on school and family conditions), cognitive tests, and school administrative data. The follow-up assessment in late adulthood included a survey (on personal and contextual factors), cognitive tests, learning tasks, and saliva sampling for DNA extraction. In addition, registry data was collected from Statistics Sweden (census), the National Board of Health and Welfare (medical records), and the Swedish National Archives (military conscription). Analysis of selectivity at follow-up showed higher retention rate among individuals with higher education and better cognitive ability in childhood, which was only partially explained by selectivity in survival. Future plans: Data collected in UGU-LIFE will be used to describe the predictors of lifelong learning, the factors that influence learning gains and engagement in learning in older age, and the mechanistic pathways through which these factors affect learning in older age. Work to add birth records and geocoding to the data is ongoing. A subsample of participants will be invited to take part in an in-depth data collection of learning an ecologically relevant task over several days. The findings will be used to design and test interventions aiming to facilitate learning in older age.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
19.5%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.9%
3
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
4
BMC Geriatrics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.8%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Experimental Gerontology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
7
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
10
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
11
European Journal of Public Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
13
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
14
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
15
Journal of Public Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Health & Place
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Biology of Sex Differences
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
Demographic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
24
Age and Ageing
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
28
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
30
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%