Back

Race and Socioeconomic Status Impact Survival from Early and Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer

Purrington, K.; Hsieh, M.-C.; Patil, S.; Mabvakure, B.; Ahn, J.; Zhang, R.; Ruterbusch, J. J.; Samdani, R.; Lee, G.; Wenzlaff, A.; Latif, S.; Dash, C.; Sartor, M.; Schwartz, A. G.; Stoffel, E. M.; Rozek, L. S.

2026-06-29 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.06.24.26356439 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) disproportionately affects non-Hispanic Black (NHB) Americans compared to Non-Hispanic White (NHW), with more cases arising before age 50. Racial disparities in outcomes reflect complex interactions among healthcare access, socioeconomic factors, and structural racism, yet analyses linking individual-level data for these factors to survival remain limited. Methods: We examined overall and CRC-specific survival among NHB and NHW patients diagnosed between 2013 and 2022 enrolled in the Disparities and Cancer Epidemiology (DANCE) cohort, a population-based study of CRC in metropolitan Detroit and Louisiana. Multivariable Cox regression and competing-risks models were used to assess the roles of race, age of onset, neighborhood deprivation, and stage on survival outcomes. Results: Among 1,019 CRC cases (57% NHB, 43% NHW), NHB patients were more likely to reside in high-deprivation neighborhoods, report lower household incomes, and present with right-sided tumors, though stage at diagnosis did not differ by race. In multivariable analysis, stage was the strongest predictor of survival, while neighborhood deprivation (per 10-unit ADI increase: HR = 1.14) was independently associated with worse survival; NHB race was not significantly associated with survival after adjustment. Younger age at diagnosis was associated with a survival advantage in regional-stage disease but paradoxically with worse survival in distant-stage disease, and higher deprivation predicted worse survival in both local and distant but not regional stage. Conclusion: Our study shows that socioeconomic factors, as measured by ADI and household income, accounts for some, but not all, of the disparities in survival between NHB and NHW CRC cases.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.5%
2
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 5%
9.3%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.2%
5
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.8%
6
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Annals of Epidemiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
8
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.4%
9
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
10
American Journal of Gastroenterology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.2%
12
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
13
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
15
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
18
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Clinical Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
23
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%