Back

CerViX-Net: A Multi-Branch Fusion of Vision Transformer and Convolutional Neural Networks for Cervical Cancer Detection using Cytology Images

De, S.

2026-06-24 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.06.24.26356425 medRxiv
Show abstract

Cervical cancer represents a pressing global health challenge, emphasizing the critical need for accurate and timely diagnostic methods to facilitate effective treatment and improve survival rates. In response to this challenge, the study presents CerViX-Net, an innovative classification framework designed to advance cervical cancer detection through enhanced computational efficiency and diagnostic accuracy. The development of CerViX-Net is motivated by the limitations of traditional diagnostic models, particularly in handling the computational and memory demands of large-scale data, while ensuring precise feature extraction and classification. CerViX-Net employs a hybrid deep learning architecture that combines the capabilities of ResNet50, EfficientNet-B0, and a Modified Vision Transformer (ViT) module. The ResNet50 branch extracts hierarchical features through stacked convolutional and identity blocks. In another path, the modified ViT module transforms image patches via linear projection, augments them with positional and class embeddings, and processes them using Parallel Transformer Encoder layers to model contextual relationships. Concurrently, EfficientNet-B0 utilizes MBConv blocks to extract multi-scale representations. The feature outputs from all three branches are integrated and passed through a classification head consisting of dropout layers and dense layers to ensure robust and accurate predictions. The proposed framework is rigorously evaluated on the Mendeley LBC dataset, achieving exceptional performance metrics with an accuracy of 99.69%, precision of 99.28%, recall of 99.48%, and an F1-score of 99.52%. The robustness of CerViX-Net is further validated on the SIPaKMeD and Herlev Pap Smear datasets, where it demonstrates comparable excellence, underscoring its efficacy and adaptability across diverse cytology datasets. Statistical validation using Friedman's test further reinforces its superiority over competing methods.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.8%
2
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.1%
4
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
5
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
6
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
9
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
13
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
14
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
15
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
16
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
17
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
20
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
21
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
22
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
23
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
24
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
25
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
26
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
27
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
28
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
29
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%